• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
    • Energy Law Blog
    • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
    • Maritime Law Blog
    • Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub

Blogs

Legislation Takes Aim at “Legacy Lawsuits”

April 9, 20252 minute read

In Corbello v. Iowa Prod. Co., 850 So. 2d 686 (La. 2003), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a “loophole” in the law where a landowner was allowed to recover millions in remediation damages for oilfield contamination without any requirement that the money be used for actual restoration. In the wake of Corbello, the Legislature responded with the enactment of “Act 312,” La. R.S. 30:29, which governs the procedure in oilfield contamination cases.  Act 312 ensures that money awarded for environmental damage is used to remediate the property to state regulatory standards while preserving a landowner’s private contractual rights. Landowners and defendants have fought for years over key provisions of Act 312 including:  the availability of “additional remediation” damages above a regulatory cleanup, the scope of recoverable attorney’s fees, and the requirements of the “Most Feasible Plan” structured by the Louisiana Department of Energy and Natural Resources “LDENR.” The upcoming legislative session will tackle two bills addressing the future of Act 312 and legacy litigation. House Bill 602 proposes several amendments to Act 312 including: limitations on the recoverable damages, alternative options for a responsible party to fund the Most Feasible Plan, and restrictions on the recovery of attorney’s fees. House Bill 634 proposes a new administrative procedure which would replace Act 312 as of January 1, 2026. Under this proposal, claims alleging environmental damage must go through a new administrative process before litigation can proceed. That administrative ruling can be appealed to an administrative law judge, and the First Circuit Court of Appeal. The new procedure would mark a significant change from Act 312, which triggers the administrative process only after a party makes a limited admission of responsibility for environmental damage or the finder of fact determines a party or parties responsible for environmental damage.

For more information contact Liskow Attorneys Kelly Becker, Jamie Rhymes, and John Troutman, and stay tuned for future updates on Liskow’s The Energy Law Blog.

 

Blogs

The 2025 Liskow CCS Legislative Update

April 8, 20253 minute read

Featured Image

The 2025 Louisiana Legislative Session will officially begin on Monday, April 14. Twenty bills have been filed on carbon capture sequestration in Louisiana. The bills range from:

  • allowing each parish to decide whether to allow CCS in its parish;
  • eliminating eminent domain for all CCS pipelines;
  • taxing CCS;
  • increasing requirements and reporting on both CCS storage facilities and pipelines;
  • requiring the compensation of mineral rights owners.

Read a brief overview of each proposed bill below:

House Bills:

  • HB 4 (Owen) Local Option – each parish can vote on allowing CCS in its parish
  • HB 75 (McCormick) Any pore space owner forced pooled/unitized will receive the highest compensation paid to any other owner
  • HB 78 (Carrier) Local option for Allen Parish to choose CCS
  • HB 250 & 251 (Owen) Local option for Vernon & Beauregard Parishes
  • HB 304 (Carter) Expropriation hearings are to be held in parish where property is located
  • HB 353 (Mack)
    • (1) Adds requirement for a storage operator to receive a certificate of public convenience and necessity to show the lack of producing minerals below the storage reservoir;
    • (2) Adds civil and criminal penalties if a storage operator does not provide required reports;
    • (3) Requires emergency plan relating to CCS pipelines;
    • (4) Requires storage operator and transporter to provide emergency equipment to local responders;
    • (5) Requires storage operator to have financial security or insurance to protect public water systems
    • (6) Adds strict liability to storage operator or transporter for any damages caused by unauthorized release of CO2
    • (7) Prohibits injection wells and pipelines within 1/2 mile of homes, schools, heath care facilities, houses of worship;
    • (8) Requires advance notice of construction of injection well or pipeline to all residences, business, and gov’t entities within 2-mile radius
    • (9) Requires remediation plan for groundwater contamination
    • (10) Requires continuous monitoring of all underground drinking water sources
    • (11) Requires routine sampling and testing of public water system by a third party, upon request
    • (12) Requires alternative potable drinking water within 24 hours and alternative water supply within 30 days if drinking water is contaminated
  • HB 380 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS storage and pipelines
  • HB 396 (McCormick) Declares CCS illegal
  • HB 444 (Mack) Establishes injection tax of $3 per metric ton for parish where CO2 is stored; also provides collection procedures
  • HB 522 (McCormick) Places moratorium on CCS in Louisiana until July 1, 2026
  • HB 537 (Schamerhorn) Creates a carbon dioxide pipeline victim lien for anyone within 25-mile radius of a pipeline release
  • HB 552 (Schamerhorn) Levies an excise tax on CCS pipelines at 5 cents per mile for parish(es) where pipeline is located
  • HB 553 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS pipelines
  • HB 568 (Carrier) Adds reporting requirements for CCS pipeline leaks, seismic activity related to CCS injections, and CCS equipment malfunction that could lead to a release; and related penalties for failure to report
  • HB 585 (McCormick) Requires advance notice to all owners (surface, mineral, servitude, operators) within the AOR before a Class VI can be deemed administratively complete
  • HB 601 (Geymann) Limits right of eminent domain for CCS pipelines to 5% of the proposed right of way (i.e, need 95% by consent to use eminent domain); Limits right of eminent domain to US companies; Requires additional upfront notice to landowners that eminent domain cannot be used without 95% consent by all owners; Requires the Commissioner to consider whether CCS pipeline considered alternative routes for non-consensual landowners before issuing certificate of convenience and necessity
  • HB 632 (Riser) Requires CCS storage operators to obtain pore space agreements from mineral rights owners; Requires mineral rights owners to be included in the 75% minimum for unitization; Requires mineral rights owners to be compensated if forced pooled via unitization proceeding; Includes mineral right owners in notices required to be given to landowners by CCS companies

Senate Bills:

  • SB 36 (Hensgens) Placeholder bill
  • SSB 73 (Reese) Requires the Commissioner to give “substantial consideration to local government comments” when determining whether to issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity for a CCS storage facility or CCS pipeline

Liskow will continue to share regular updates throughout this session about CCS legislation on the 2025 CCS Legislative Update page from Liskow attorney and Louisiana Lobbyist Neil Abramson and CCS attorney Jeff Lieberman.

Blogs

The 2025 Liskow CCS Legislative Update

April 8, 20253 minute read

The 2025 Louisiana Legislative Session will officially begin on Monday, April 14. Twenty bills have been filed on carbon capture sequestration in Louisiana. The bills range from:

  • allowing each parish to decide whether to allow CCS in its parish;
  • eliminating eminent domain for all CCS pipelines;
  • taxing CCS;
  • increasing requirements and reporting on both CCS storage facilities and pipelines;
  • requiring the compensation of mineral rights owners.

Read a brief overview of each proposed bill below:

House Bills:

  • HB 4 (Owen) Local Option – each parish can vote on allowing CCS in its parish
  • HB 75 (McCormick) Any pore space owner forced pooled/unitized will receive the highest compensation paid to any other owner
  • HB 78 (Carrier) Local option for Allen Parish to choose CCS
  • HB 250 & 251 (Owen) Local option for Vernon & Beauregard Parishes
  • HB 304 (Carter) Expropriation hearings are to be held in parish where property is located
  • HB 353 (Mack)
    • (1) Adds requirement for a storage operator to receive a certificate of public convenience and necessity to show the lack of producing minerals below the storage reservoir;
    • (2) Adds civil and criminal penalties if a storage operator does not provide required reports;
    • (3) Requires emergency plan relating to CCS pipelines;
    • (4) Requires storage operator and transporter to provide emergency equipment to local responders;
    • (5) Requires storage operator to have financial security or insurance to protect public water systems
    • (6) Adds strict liability to storage operator or transporter for any damages caused by unauthorized release of CO2
    • (7) Prohibits injection wells and pipelines within 1/2 mile of homes, schools, heath care facilities, houses of worship;
    • (8) Requires advance notice of construction of injection well or pipeline to all residences, business, and gov’t entities within 2-mile radius
    • (9) Requires remediation plan for groundwater contamination
    • (10) Requires continuous monitoring of all underground drinking water sources
    • (11) Requires routine sampling and testing of public water system by a third party, upon request
    • (12) Requires alternative potable drinking water within 24 hours and alternative water supply within 30 days if drinking water is contaminated
  • HB 380 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS storage and pipelines
  • HB 396 (McCormick) Declares CCS illegal
  • HB 444 (Mack) Establishes injection tax of $3 per metric ton for parish where CO2 is stored; also provides collection procedures
  • HB 522 (McCormick) Places moratorium on CCS in Louisiana until July 1, 2026
  • HB 537 (Schamerhorn) Creates a carbon dioxide pipeline victim lien for anyone within 25-mile radius of a pipeline release
  • HB 552 (Schamerhorn) Levies an excise tax on CCS pipelines at 5 cents per mile for parish(es) where pipeline is located
  • HB 553 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS pipelines
  • HB 568 (Carrier) Adds reporting requirements for CCS pipeline leaks, seismic activity related to CCS injections, and CCS equipment malfunction that could lead to a release; and related penalties for failure to report
  • HB 585 (McCormick) Requires advance notice to all owners (surface, mineral, servitude, operators) within the AOR before a Class VI can be deemed administratively complete
  • HB 601 (Geymann) Limits right of eminent domain for CCS pipelines to 5% of the proposed right of way (i.e, need 95% by consent to use eminent domain); Limits right of eminent domain to US companies; Requires additional upfront notice to landowners that eminent domain cannot be used without 95% consent by all owners; Requires the Commissioner to consider whether CCS pipeline considered alternative routes for non-consensual landowners before issuing certificate of convenience and necessity
  • HB 632 (Riser) Requires CCS storage operators to obtain pore space agreements from mineral rights owners; Requires mineral rights owners to be included in the 75% minimum for unitization; Requires mineral rights owners to be compensated if forced pooled via unitization proceeding; Includes mineral right owners in notices required to be given to landowners by CCS companies

Senate Bills:

  • SB 36 (Hensgens) Placeholder bill
  • SSB 73 (Reese) Requires the Commissioner to give “substantial consideration to local government comments” when determining whether to issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity for a CCS storage facility or CCS pipeline

Liskow will continue to share regular updates throughout this session about CCS legislation on the 2025 CCS Legislative Update page from Liskow attorney and Louisiana Lobbyist Neil Abramson and CCS attorney Jeff Lieberman.

Blogs

The 2025 Liskow CCS Legislative Update

April 8, 20253 minute read

Featured Image

 

The 2025 Louisiana Legislative Session will officially begin on Monday, April 14. Twenty bills have been filed on carbon capture sequestration in Louisiana. The bills range from:

  • allowing each parish to decide whether to allow CCS in its parish;
  • eliminating eminent domain for all CCS pipelines;
  • taxing CCS;
  • increasing requirements and reporting on both CCS storage facilities and pipelines;
  • requiring the compensation of mineral rights owners.

Read a brief overview of each proposed bill below:

House Bills:

  • HB 4 (Owen) Local Option – each parish can vote on allowing CCS in its parish
  • HB 75 (McCormick) Any pore space owner forced pooled/unitized will receive the highest compensation paid to any other owner
  • HB 78 (Carrier) Local option for Allen Parish to choose CCS
  • HB 250 & 251 (Owen) Local option for Vernon & Beauregard Parishes
  • HB 304 (Carter) Expropriation hearings are to be held in parish where property is located
  • HB 353 (Mack)
    • (1) Adds requirement for a storage operator to receive a certificate of public convenience and necessity to show the lack of producing minerals below the storage reservoir;
    • (2) Adds civil and criminal penalties if a storage operator does not provide required reports;
    • (3) Requires emergency plan relating to CCS pipelines;
    • (4) Requires storage operator and transporter to provide emergency equipment to local responders;
    • (5) Requires storage operator to have financial security or insurance to protect public water systems
    • (6) Adds strict liability to storage operator or transporter for any damages caused by unauthorized release of CO2
    • (7) Prohibits injection wells and pipelines within 1/2 mile of homes, schools, heath care facilities, houses of worship;
    • (8) Requires advance notice of construction of injection well or pipeline to all residences, business, and gov’t entities within 2-mile radius
    • (9) Requires remediation plan for groundwater contamination
    • (10) Requires continuous monitoring of all underground drinking water sources
    • (11) Requires routine sampling and testing of public water system by a third party, upon request
    • (12) Requires alternative potable drinking water within 24 hours and alternative water supply within 30 days if drinking water is contaminated
  • HB 380 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS storage and pipelines
  • HB 396 (McCormick) Declares CCS illegal
  • HB 444 (Mack) Establishes injection tax of $3 per metric ton for parish where CO2 is stored; also provides collection procedures
  • HB 522 (McCormick) Places moratorium on CCS in Louisiana until July 1, 2026
  • HB 537 (Schamerhorn) Creates a carbon dioxide pipeline victim lien for anyone within 25-mile radius of a pipeline release
  • HB 552 (Schamerhorn) Levies an excise tax on CCS pipelines at 5 cents per mile for parish(es) where pipeline is located
  • HB 553 (Schamerhorn) Eliminates eminent domain for CCS pipelines
  • HB 568 (Carrier) Adds reporting requirements for CCS pipeline leaks, seismic activity related to CCS injections, and CCS equipment malfunction that could lead to a release; and related penalties for failure to report
  • HB 585 (McCormick) Requires advance notice to all owners (surface, mineral, servitude, operators) within the AOR before a Class VI can be deemed administratively complete
  • HB 601 (Geymann) Limits right of eminent domain for CCS pipelines to 5% of the proposed right of way (i.e, need 95% by consent to use eminent domain); Limits right of eminent domain to US companies; Requires additional upfront notice to landowners that eminent domain cannot be used without 95% consent by all owners; Requires the Commissioner to consider whether CCS pipeline considered alternative routes for non-consensual landowners before issuing certificate of convenience and necessity
  • HB 632 (Riser) Requires CCS storage operators to obtain pore space agreements from mineral rights owners; Requires mineral rights owners to be included in the 75% minimum for unitization; Requires mineral rights owners to be compensated if forced pooled via unitization proceeding; Includes mineral right owners in notices required to be given to landowners by CCS companies

Senate Bills:

  • SB 36 (Hensgens) Placeholder bill
  • SSB 73 (Reese) Requires the Commissioner to give “substantial consideration to local government comments” when determining whether to issue a certificate of public convenience and necessity for a CCS storage facility or CCS pipeline

Liskow will continue to share regular updates throughout this session about CCS legislation on the 2025 CCS Legislative Update page from Liskow attorney and Louisiana Lobbyist Neil Abramson and CCS attorney Jeff Lieberman.

Blogs

Proposed Severance Tax Legislation

April 7, 20253 minute read

Several bills aimed at making changes to Louisiana severance tax laws were filed on Friday, the deadline for pre-filing bills to be considered during the Louisiana Legislature’s upcoming regular session, which is a fiscal one.

State Rep. Brett Geymann, chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, pre-filed H.B. No. 495, H.B. No. 518 and H.B. No. 600 which would provide as follows:

For taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025, H.B. No. 495 would retain the horizontal well exemption for oil as provided in present law but limits the duration for which the exemption applies to gas. The proposed legislation provides that the horizontal well exemption for gas shall last for a period of six months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first. Present law provides that the horizontal well exemption for oil and gas shall last for a period of 24 months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first.

H.B. No. 518 proposes significant amendments to Louisiana’s severance tax laws, particularly focusing on the rates, computation, and administration of severance taxes on oil, gas, and other natural resources. The bill updates the title of R.S. 47:633 from “Rates of tax” to “Severance tax; rates; administration” and introduces new provisions for calculating severance tax based on the quantity or value of resources severed. It specifies a tax rate of 12.5% for oil, determined by either gross receipts or posted field prices, and outlines exemptions and reduced tax rates for oil produced from incapable or stripper wells, as well as provisions for inactive or orphan wells.

Additionally, H.B. No. 518 establishes a structured exemption system for severance taxes based on market prices for oil and natural gas, with exemptions decreasing as prices rise. It introduces new definitions and clarifications regarding the qualifications of accountants verifying well costs and specifies conditions under which the gas severance tax will not accrue. The bill also updates tax rates for various natural resources and empowers the Louisiana Forestry Commission to determine the market value of trees and timber. The legislative digest states that the proposed changes aim to streamline the severance tax process while ensuring clarity and accuracy in its administration.

H.B. N0. 600 contains a provision to reduce the severance tax for newly produced oil by establishing a rate of 6.5% on oil produced from wells completed on or after July 1, 2025.  In addition, H.B. No. 600 proposes to change the special rate on oil produced from incapable wells from 1/2 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 6.25%. In addition, the proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from stripper wells from ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 3.125%. Proposed law would also change the special rate on oil produced from inactive wells from ½ or ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 6.25% or 3.125%, depending on when the oil was produced. Lastly this proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from orphan wells from ¼ or 1/8 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 3.125% or 1.565%, depending on when the oil was produced. These changes would apply to taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025.

State Rep. Larry Bagley pre-filed H.B. No. 294 proposing to amend Article VII, Section 4(D)(3) of the Louisiana Constitution to repeal the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed constitutional amendment would require that 20% of all severance tax revenues on the natural resources specified in the present constitution, regardless of the dollar amount, be remitted to the governing authority of the parish in which severance or production occurs. In addition, the proposed constitutional amendment would repeal Article VII, Section 4(D)(4) of the present Constitution, rendered without effect by the repeal of the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed legislation provides for submission of the proposed constitutional amendment to the voters at the statewide election to be held Nov. 3, 2026.

Changes to these pieces of proposed legislation could be made during the legislative process. Liskow will be monitoring for updates during this legislative session.

For further updates regarding this topic, contact Liskow attorneys Bob Angelico, Caroline Lafourcade, and Kevin Naccari, Jr. and visit our Tax practice page.

Blogs

Proposed Severance Tax Legislation

April 7, 20253 minute read

Several bills aimed at making changes to Louisiana severance tax laws were filed on Friday, the deadline for pre-filing bills to be considered during the Louisiana Legislature’s upcoming regular session, which is a fiscal one.

State Rep. Brett Geymann, chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, pre-filed H.B. No. 495, H.B. No. 518 and H.B. No. 600 which would provide as follows:

For taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025, H.B. No. 495 would retain the horizontal well exemption for oil as provided in present law but limits the duration for which the exemption applies to gas. The proposed legislation provides that the horizontal well exemption for gas shall last for a period of six months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first. Present law provides that the horizontal well exemption for oil and gas shall last for a period of 24 months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first.

H.B. No. 518 proposes significant amendments to Louisiana’s severance tax laws, particularly focusing on the rates, computation, and administration of severance taxes on oil, gas, and other natural resources. The bill updates the title of R.S. 47:633 from “Rates of tax” to “Severance tax; rates; administration” and introduces new provisions for calculating severance tax based on the quantity or value of resources severed. It specifies a tax rate of 12.5% for oil, determined by either gross receipts or posted field prices, and outlines exemptions and reduced tax rates for oil produced from incapable or stripper wells, as well as provisions for inactive or orphan wells.

Additionally, H.B. No. 518 establishes a structured exemption system for severance taxes based on market prices for oil and natural gas, with exemptions decreasing as prices rise. It introduces new definitions and clarifications regarding the qualifications of accountants verifying well costs and specifies conditions under which the gas severance tax will not accrue. The bill also updates tax rates for various natural resources and empowers the Louisiana Forestry Commission to determine the market value of trees and timber. The legislative digest states that the proposed changes aim to streamline the severance tax process while ensuring clarity and accuracy in its administration.

H.B. N0. 600 contains a provision to reduce the severance tax for newly produced oil by establishing a rate of 6.5% on oil produced from wells completed on or after July 1, 2025.  In addition, H.B. No. 600 proposes to change the special rate on oil produced from incapable wells from 1/2 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 6.25%. In addition, the proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from stripper wells from ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 3.125%. Proposed law would also change the special rate on oil produced from inactive wells from ½ or ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 6.25% or 3.125%, depending on when the oil was produced. Lastly this proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from orphan wells from ¼ or 1/8 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 3.125% or 1.565%, depending on when the oil was produced. These changes would apply to taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025.

State Rep. Larry Bagley pre-filed H.B. No. 294 proposing to amend Article VII, Section 4(D)(3) of the Louisiana Constitution to repeal the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed constitutional amendment would require that 20% of all severance tax revenues on the natural resources specified in the present constitution, regardless of the dollar amount, be remitted to the governing authority of the parish in which severance or production occurs. In addition, the proposed constitutional amendment would repeal Article VII, Section 4(D)(4) of the present Constitution, rendered without effect by the repeal of the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed legislation provides for submission of the proposed constitutional amendment to the voters at the statewide election to be held Nov. 3, 2026.

Changes to these pieces of proposed legislation could be made during the legislative process. Liskow will be monitoring for updates during this legislative session.

For further updates regarding this topic, contact Liskow attorneys Bob Angelico, Caroline Lafourcade, and Kevin Naccari, Jr. and visit our Tax practice page.

Blogs

Proposed Severance Tax Legislation

April 7, 20253 minute read

Featured Image

Several bills aimed at making changes to Louisiana severance tax laws were filed on Friday, the deadline for pre-filing bills to be considered during the Louisiana Legislature’s upcoming regular session, which is a fiscal one.

State Rep. Brett Geymann, chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, pre-filed H.B. No. 495, H.B. No. 518 and H.B. No. 600 which would provide as follows:

For taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025, H.B. No. 495 would retain the horizontal well exemption for oil as provided in present law but limits the duration for which the exemption applies to gas. The proposed legislation provides that the horizontal well exemption for gas shall last for a period of six months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first. Present law provides that the horizontal well exemption for oil and gas shall last for a period of 24 months or until payout of the well cost is achieved, whichever comes first.

H.B. No. 518 proposes significant amendments to Louisiana’s severance tax laws, particularly focusing on the rates, computation, and administration of severance taxes on oil, gas, and other natural resources. The bill updates the title of R.S. 47:633 from “Rates of tax” to “Severance tax; rates; administration” and introduces new provisions for calculating severance tax based on the quantity or value of resources severed. It specifies a tax rate of 12.5% for oil, determined by either gross receipts or posted field prices, and outlines exemptions and reduced tax rates for oil produced from incapable or stripper wells, as well as provisions for inactive or orphan wells.

Additionally, H.B. No. 518 establishes a structured exemption system for severance taxes based on market prices for oil and natural gas, with exemptions decreasing as prices rise. It introduces new definitions and clarifications regarding the qualifications of accountants verifying well costs and specifies conditions under which the gas severance tax will not accrue. The bill also updates tax rates for various natural resources and empowers the Louisiana Forestry Commission to determine the market value of trees and timber. The legislative digest states that the proposed changes aim to streamline the severance tax process while ensuring clarity and accuracy in its administration.

H.B. N0. 600 contains a provision to reduce the severance tax for newly produced oil by establishing a rate of 6.5% on oil produced from wells completed on or after July 1, 2025.  In addition, H.B. No. 600 proposes to change the special rate on oil produced from incapable wells from 1/2 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 6.25%. In addition, the proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from stripper wells from ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law to 3.125%. Proposed law would also change the special rate on oil produced from inactive wells from ½ or ¼ of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 6.25% or 3.125%, depending on when the oil was produced. Lastly this proposed law would change the special rate on oil produced from orphan wells from ¼ or 1/8 of the regular rate provided for in present law and proposed law, depending on when the oil was produced, to 3.125% or 1.565%, depending on when the oil was produced. These changes would apply to taxable periods beginning on or after July 1, 2025.

State Rep. Larry Bagley pre-filed H.B. No. 294 proposing to amend Article VII, Section 4(D)(3) of the Louisiana Constitution to repeal the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed constitutional amendment would require that 20% of all severance tax revenues on the natural resources specified in the present constitution, regardless of the dollar amount, be remitted to the governing authority of the parish in which severance or production occurs. In addition, the proposed constitutional amendment would repeal Article VII, Section 4(D)(4) of the present Constitution, rendered without effect by the repeal of the dollar-amount limit on severance tax revenues to be remitted to parishes. The proposed legislation provides for submission of the proposed constitutional amendment to the voters at the statewide election to be held Nov. 3, 2026.

Changes to these pieces of proposed legislation could be made during the legislative process. Liskow will be monitoring for updates during this legislative session.

For further updates regarding this topic, contact Liskow attorneys Bob Angelico, Caroline Lafourcade, and Kevin Naccari, Jr. and visit our Tax practice page.

Blogs

LDR Clarifies Sales and Use Tax Treatment for the Rental of Equipment with an Operator

April 7, 2025less than a minute

On April 3, 2025, the Louisiana Department of Revenue published Revenue Information Bulletin No. 25-013 clarifying the proper sales and use tax treatment for rentals of cranes and other equipment with operators. Under Act 11 of the Third Extraordinary Session of 2024, the Louisiana Legislature repealed the statutory sales and use tax exclusion for the lease or rental of cranes and related equipment with operators. However, R.I.B. No. 25-013 makes clear that this repeal does not mean that all leases of cranes and other related equipment are taxable. The lease or rental of a crane and related equipment with an operator will  be treated the same as other rentals of tangible personal property with operators for sales and use tax purposes.

Read the full post on The Gulf Coast Business Law Blog here.

Blogs

LDR Clarifies Sales and Use Tax Treatment for the Rental of Equipment with an Operator

April 7, 2025less than a minute

Featured Image

 

On April 3, 2025, the Louisiana Department of Revenue published Revenue Information Bulletin No. 25-013 clarifying the proper sales and use tax treatment for rentals of cranes and other equipment with operators. Under Act 11 of the Third Extraordinary Session of 2024, the Louisiana Legislature repealed the statutory sales and use tax exclusion for the lease or rental of cranes and related equipment with operators. However, R.I.B. No. 25-013 makes clear that this repeal does not mean that all leases of cranes and other related equipment are taxable. The lease or rental of a crane and related equipment with an operator will  be treated the same as other rentals of tangible personal property with operators for sales and use tax purposes.

Read the full post on The Gulf Coast Business Law Blog here.

 

Blogs

LDR Clarifies Sales and Use Tax Treatment for the Rental of Equipment with an Operator

April 7, 20252 minute read

On April 3, 2025, the Louisiana Department of Revenue published Revenue Information Bulletin No. 25-013 clarifying the proper sales and use tax treatment for rentals of cranes and other equipment with operators. Under Act 11 of the Third Extraordinary Session of 2024, the Louisiana Legislature repealed the statutory sales and use tax exclusion for the lease or rental of cranes and related equipment with operators. However, R.I.B. No. 25-013 makes clear that this repeal does not mean that all leases of cranes and other related equipment are taxable. The lease or rental of a crane and related equipment with an operator will  be treated the same as other rentals of tangible personal property with operators for sales and use tax purposes.

Whether a lease or rental of tangible personal property, including cranes and related equipment, with an operator is subject to sales and use tax is determined based on whether the “essence of the transaction” is the performance of a service (not taxable) or the lease of tangible personal property (taxable).  The taxability of such transactions is determined by following the analysis provided in LAC 61:I.4301 “Lease or Rental (c)(i) and (ii). That regulation provides that:

i.  A lease or rental does not include providing tangible personal property with an operator who provides some additional service for a fixed or indeterminate period of time when the essence of the transaction is the performance of a service. The essence of the transaction is to provide a service when obtaining the tangible personal property is not an end in and of itself but rather furnishes the mechanism through which a service is provided.

ii. In order to determine the essence of a transaction involving both the performance of a service and the providing of tangible personal property, the facts and circumstances of each transaction must be examined. The following factors suggest, but are not necessarily conclusive, that the essence of the transaction is for the performance of a service:

(a) in order for the tangible personal property to perform as designed, the owner’s operator maintains control over the property. This level of control by the owner’s operator involves more than maintaining, inspecting, or setting-up the property;

(b) the contract between the owner of the property and the person receiving the services and property provides for the performance of a specific job that requires services for a certain number of hours or until completion of a specific job; 

(c) the performance of the job using the tangible personal property is conducted in a manner determined by the owner of the property;

(d) the owner of the tangible personal property is responsible for choosing the particular piece of property to be used in the transaction; or

(e) the owner of the tangible personal property has a standard business practice of not allowing customers to rent the property separately from the services provided.

The R.I.B. makes clear that the regulation for the lease or rental of tangible personal property with an operator will also apply to the lease or rental of cranes and other related equipment. “If the facts and circumstances indicate the essence of the transaction is the performance of a service, the lease or rental of a crane with an operator will be treated as a non-taxable service.”

For further questions regarding this update, please contact Liskow attorneys Bob Angelico, Caroline Lafourcade, or Kevin Naccari and visit our Tax practice page and The Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub for further updates.

Blogs

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 185
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Louisiana Makes DOE’s Nuclear Shortlist
  • Louisiana Rewrites the Rules of Getting Paid: What Act 822 of 2026 Means for Companies Involved in Industrial Construction
  • House Advances Sweeping Maritime Reforms in FY27 Defense Bill
  • Establishment of the Marine Minerals Administration
  • The Foundation for Natural Resources and Energy Law Elects Jana Grauberger as President

Categories

  • Blogs
  • Events
  • Insights
  • News
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog