• Skip to content

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights

Legacy/Oilfield Contamination Litigation

Practices

  • Energy – Litigation

As a leading firm for claims regarding land damage attributable to historical operations of oil and gas companies, we have consistently proven ourselves as we have championed our clients’ positions. Our substantial trial experience is complemented by our appellate achievements, where we have established legal defenses and the procedural framework applicable in legacy cases.

Overview

Regulators trust us. In the 1930s, we pioneered the administrative hearings in oil and gas matters in front of the Office of Conservation, and we have continued to work closely with regulators. We know what the agency practices were back then, how their process has evolved throughout the decades, and what they require at present.

Since the proliferation of legacy lawsuits following the Louisiana Supreme Court’s seminal decision in Corbello, we have led the way in matters interpreting and applying Act 312, which governs the procedures and remedies in legacy cases. Our experience ranges from litigating matters through trial, to handling hearings on behalf of energy companies in front of the Louisiana Office of Conservation and the Department of Natural Resources. We have extensive experience working with environmental consultants and the agencies to determine whether remedial action is required and if so, what remediation is necessary. These trials and administrative proceedings involve extensive expert testimony where we have valuable scientific knowledge when it comes to ecological risk assessments, fate and transport, geology, geomorphology, groundwater modeling and more.

Looking to the future through a historical lens of the past

When our clients face claims that can cost hundreds of millions of dollars, we immediately analyze their historical operations under the framework of the rules and regulations in place at the time of those operations. Evaluating a company’s historical footprint and operations allows us to analyze your potential share of liability and identify available defenses. We also handle indemnity and contribution claims among operators who worked on the same lease or consecutively. Our position of strength is always to be trial ready, but our goal is to fully support your business objectives, and what it takes to meet them.

Institutional – and intimate – knowledge of the law

We know the procedural complexities of Act 312. And our extensive experience litigating oil and gas disputes places us in the best position to navigate the complicated combination of oil and gas law, tort law, and administrative law found in every legacy case. Liskow has helped to develop the law in this area. In fact, a client retained us as appellate counsel in the first-ever legacy case involving claims for historical oilfield contamination to go through Louisiana’s Act 312 procedure.

Our clients rely on us to assess the risks and present them with their options. Only a handful of legacy lawsuits have gone to trial, and Liskow has successfully served as defense counsel in several legacy cases and has tried three of them to a zero-verdict result. In the appellate arena, we succeeded in limiting legacy claims by establishing legal defenses such as the subsequent purchaser doctrine and getting stale claims dismissed as time-barred.

Our active involvement in the statutory interpretation of unresolved issues of Act 312 that are being fought in the court system means we are keenly aware of what’s at stake for our clients. And because we regularly handle Act 312 administrative hearings, we are at the forefront of developments in this area.

We are known for these strengths

  • Liskow handles environmental litigation claims that allege contamination of wells or well sites, tank batteries and production facilities. We have deep knowledge of operations that can cause spills and leaks, when they are expected and when there is residual impact.
  • We work closely with experts to determine toxicity through ECOTOX, on fate and transport analysis and more.
  • We help clients navigate their actions after the proceedings are over – that is, through remediation management – when it comes to the clean-up or monitoring of their sites, and further actions they must take.

Initial Contacts

  • Kelly Becker
    kbbecker@liskow.com
    504.556.4067504.556.4067
  • Michael Cash
    mcash@liskow.com
    713.651.2839713.651.2839
  • Jamie Rhymes
    Jdrhymes@liskow.com
    337.267.2360337.267.2360

Our Team

Shareholders

  • Media item displaying: George Arceneaux III

    George Arceneaux III

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2332337.267.2332
    995
  • Media item displaying: Erin Bambrick

    Erin Bambrick

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4005504.556.4005
    995
  • Media item displaying: Kelly Brechtel Becker

    Kelly Brechtel Becker

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4067504.556.4067
    995
  • Media item displaying: Laura Springer Brown

    Laura Springer Brown

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4021504.556.4021
    995
  • Media item displaying: Michael P. Cash

    Michael P. Cash

    Shareholder

    Houston
    713.651.2839713.651.2839
    995
  • Media item displaying: Hunter Chauvin

    Hunter Chauvin

    Shareholder

    Baton Rouge
    225.341.4313225.341.4313
    995
  • Media item displaying: Mark R. Deethardt

    Mark R. Deethardt

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4088504.556.4088
    995
  • Media item displaying: Jonathan J. Fox

    Jonathan J. Fox

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4057504.556.4057
    995
  • Media item displaying: Kathryn Gonski

    Kathryn Gonski

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4029504.556.4029
    995
  • Media item displaying: R. Keith Jarrett

    R. Keith Jarrett

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4133504.556.4133
    995
  • Media item displaying: Amy Allums Lee

    Amy Allums Lee

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2366337.267.2366
    995
  • Media item displaying: Trinity Morale

    Trinity Morale

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4036504.556.4036
    995
  • Media item displaying: Jamie D. Rhymes

    Jamie D. Rhymes

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2360337.267.2360
    995
  • Media item displaying: April L. Rolen-Ogden

    April L. Rolen-Ogden

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2330337.267.2330
    995
  • Media item displaying: Cherrell Simms Taplin

    Cherrell Simms Taplin

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4025504.556.4025
    995
  • Media item displaying: Court C. VanTassell

    Court C. VanTassell

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2380337.267.2380
    995
  • Media item displaying: Elizabeth S. Wheeler

    Elizabeth S. Wheeler

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4013504.556.4013
    995

Of Counsel

  • Media item displaying: Paul Adkins

    Paul Adkins

    Of Counsel

    Baton Rouge
    225.341.4684225.341.4684
    995
  • Media item displaying: Lawrence P. “Larry” Simon, Jr.

    Lawrence P. “Larry” Simon, Jr.

    Of Counsel

    Lafayette
    337.267.2323337.267.2323
    995

Associates

  • Media item displaying: Joe Heaton

    Joe Heaton

    Associate

    Lafayette
    337.267.2314337.267.2314
    995
  • Media item displaying: Hayley M. Landry

    Hayley M. Landry

    Associate

    New Orleans
    504.556.4140504.556.4140
    995
  • Media item displaying: John M. Parker

    John M. Parker

    Associate

    Lafayette
    337-267-2331337-267-2331
    995
  • Media item displaying: Denice Redd-Robinette

    Denice Redd-Robinette

    Associate

    Baton Rouge
    225.341.4471225.341.4471
    995
  • Media item displaying: Cristian M. Soler

    Cristian M. Soler

    Associate

    New Orleans
    504.556.4049504.556.4049
    995

INSIGHTS

  • Blogs
    06.21.23
    “Juries cannot simply pick a number and put it in the blank.” – Texas Supreme Court Remands Case Involving $15 Million Jury Award for Noneconomic Damages Where Award was Unsupported and Arguments to the Jury Unsubstantiated
    5 minute read
  • News
    10.04.22
    Lawdragon Names 4 Liskow Lawyers to 2023 500 Leading Litigators in America List
    less than a minute
View All
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2025 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog