• Skip to content

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights

The 2024 Liskow CCS Legislative Update

CCS will face another active year in the 2024 Louisiana Regular Legislative Session. Nine bills have already been filed on CCS: local moratoriums and compliance with local land use provisions; unitization; and much more. If you’re active in the CCS space or are planning to become active, check this page for regular updates provided by CCS Lawyer and Lobbyist Neil Abramson and CCS Lawyer Jeff Lieberman.

Week 1

The Louisiana Legislative Session for 2024 officially began on March 11.  Nine bills have already been filed on CCS.

These bills have potentially far-reaching implications for CCS projects. Most of the bills either target CCS projects in specific areas or seek to eliminate or place significant hurdles on CCS development generally.  One bill (HB 696 by House Chairman Geymann) authorizes the unitization of CCS reservoirs by the Commissioner upon application of the storage operator.

All bills were filed in the House, and all of them were referred to the House Natural Resources Committee, except one (HB 73) which was referred to the House Municipal Committee.  No hearing dates have been set in either committee.  The deadline for filing bills is April 2.

A summary of each bill can be found here. 

Liskow will share regular updates throughout the Louisiana Legislative Session about CCS legislation.

Week 4

The Louisiana House Committee is scheduled to hear multiple bills concerning Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) this Thursday, April 4. Among them, five bills aim to regulate or restrict CCS activities and will be heard by the House Natural Resources & Environment Committee at 9 A.M. The proposed legislation covers a range of issues, from requiring CCS projects to comply with local ordinances to placing moratoriums on certain areas and imposing additional requirements on CCS projects. 

Here’s a brief overview of each bill:

  1. HB 276 (Carter), requires that CCS projects comply with local land use and zoning ordinances.
  2. HB 280 (Coates), prohibits the permitting of any structures which protrude above the surface of Lake Maurepas and Lake Ponchartrain.
  3. HB 289 (Mack), prohibits Class VI injection wells in Caney Lake, Lake Maurepas, Lake Ponchartrain and Toledo Bend Reservoir.
  4. HB 389 (Mack), places a moratorium on CCS below Lake Maurepas and the Maurepas Swamp Wildlife Management Area.
  5. HB 516 (Mack), imposes additional requirements and restrictions on CCS projects, including emergency response plans, community notification systems, maps of CCS facilities, locations of CCS facilities, and groundwater monitoring.

Liskow will continue to share regular updates throughout the Louisiana Legislative Session about CCS legislation.


This has been a great week for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in Louisiana. The first round of bills on CCS went forward yesterday, April 4. Four bills aiming to regulate or restrict CCS activities were scheduled by the House Natural Resources & Environment Committee and did not pass. One moved forward with amendments to the House floor.

DEFEATED/DEFERRED:

  • HB 276 (Carter), requires that CCS projects comply with local land use and zoning ordinances.  
  • HB 280 (Coates), prohibits the permitting of any structures which protrude above the surface of Lake Maurepas and Lake Ponchartrain.  
  • HB 289 (Mack), prohibits Class VI injection wells in Caney Lake, Lake Maurepas, Lake Ponchartrain and Toledo Bend Reservoir. 
  • HB 389 (Mack), places a moratorium on CCS below Lake Maurepas and the Maurepas Swamp Wildlife Management Area. 
  • MOVED TO HOUSE FLOOR WITH AMENDMENTS:HB 516 (Mack), imposes additional requirements and restrictions on CCS projects, including emergency response plans, community notification systems, maps of CCS facilities, locations of CCS facilities, and groundwater monitoring.   While the bill moved to the floor, committee members asked the author to consider additional amendments when the bill comes up for debate on the floor, and it is anticipated that there will be much discussion about additional amendments to the bill going forward.

The Second Round of CCS bills are scheduled for hearing before the same House Committee on Tuesday, April 9 – with seven bills on the agenda.  Several of those bills are expected to be voted out of committee, with amendments.  Stay tuned for a blog update on Monday morning with a forecast of that hearing.

Week 5

The Louisiana Legislative Session continues to address Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) with several bills up for discussion by the Committee on Natural Resources tomorrow, Tuesday, April 9, at 9 a.m. The proposed bills touch upon unitization, eminent domain, liability concerns, and revenue dedication of CCS within the state.

The descriptions of the five bills can be found below:

  • HB 169 (Carter), provides relative to liability and damages resulting from carbon sequestration
  • HB 492 (Geymann), provides relative to eminent domain
  • HB 696 (Geymann), authorizes unitization for carbon dioxide sequestration
  • HB 729 (Carter), removes eminent domain authority for carbon dioxide sequestration
  • HB 774 (McCormick), provides relative to eminent domain and compensation for mineral owners
  • HB 934 (LaCombe), provides for the dedication of revenue from carbon dioxide sequestration on state lands and water bottoms
  • HB 937 (Geymann), provides relative to landowner liability for carbon dioxide sequestration

We’ll provide further insights into the outcomes and implications in an upcoming blog post.


Three bills relating to Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) projects sponsored by Chairman Geymann passed favorably out of the Louisiana House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment. The description of those bills can be found below:

  • HB 492 by Chairman Geymann was originally filed to make a limited grammatical change to the eminent domain provision for CCS projects, but served as a placeholder bill for Chairman Geymann to make amendments during committee.  The amendments to HB 492 included important clarifications for eminent domain relative to transportation for CCS projects, particularly for pipeline companies.  As amended, HB 492 sets out eminent domain authority for transportation projects related to CCS and provides a clear procedure for obtaining that eminent domain authority.  Conversely, HB 492 as amended removes existing eminent domain authority for storage operators relative to pore space rights, which is being replaced by unitization as set forth in another Chairman Geymann bill, HB 696.
  • HB 696 by Chairman Geymann creates the authority for unitization of CCS reservoirs, which is currently not allowed in Louisiana law for CCS projects.  HB 696 follows a similar procedure for unitization which has historically existed in Louisiana for oil and gas projects.  Under HB 696,  unitization will be done by the Commissioner of Conservation upon application of a CCS operator.   Notice and hearing procedures are included, plus a requirement that a minimum of 75% of pore space owners must be agreeable to unitization as a prerequisite to the application.  All pore space owners who have not already entered into a contract with the storage operator will be compensated equitably with other members of the unit.  HB 696 provides the Commissioner with authority to promulgate regulations to establish the fair and equitable compensation schedule.
  • HB 937 by Chairman Geymann provides that landowners, by the mere fact of being landowners, cannot be held liable for any actions related to CCS projects on their property.  HB 937 does not override any contractual obligations which might exist.

In addition, two other bills also regarding CCS projects within the state will be heard later this week. The description of those bills can be found below:

  • HB 934 by Rep. Lacombe seeks to correct an unintended consequence from HB 571 last year which intended to direct 30% of revenue from CCS projects on state owned to the local governments but has been interpreted to exclude revenue sharing with local governments on CCS projects on state property operated by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.  HB 934 passed out of committee.
  • HB 774 by Rep. McCormick sought to provide for compensation for mineral rights following pore space expropriation.  HB 774 was deferred but Rep. McCormick may request a study of the issue.

The next step will be for the bills to be heard on the House Floor, so stay tuned for more updates as they pass through.  

Week 6

Three Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) bills sponsored by Chairman Geymann are scheduled for a vote on the House Floor this afternoon: 

  • HB 492 defines eminent domain authority for pipeline transportation related to CCS and provides a clear procedure for obtaining that eminent domain authority.  HB 492, however, removes existing eminent domain authority for storage operators relative to pore space rights, which is being replaced by unitization as set forth in another Chairman Geymann bill, HB 696.
  • HB 696 by Chairman Geymann creates the authority for unitization of CCS reservoirs, which is currently not allowed in Louisiana law for CCS projects.  HB 696 follows a similar procedure for unitization which has historically existed in Louisiana for oil and gas projects.  Under HB 696,  unitization will be done by the Commissioner of Conservation upon application of a CCS operator.   Notice and hearing procedures are included, plus a requirement that a minimum of 75% of pore space owners must be agreeable to unitization as a prerequisite to the application.  All pore space owners who have not already entered into a contract with the storage operator will be compensated equitably with other members of the unit.  HB 696 provides the Commissioner with authority to promulgate regulations to establish the fair and equitable compensation schedule.
  • HB 937 by Chairman Geymann provides that landowners, by the mere fact of being landowners, cannot be held liable for any actions related to CCS projects on their property.  HB 937 does not override any contractual obligations which might exist.

Two additional CCS bills will also be heard on the House floor this afternoon:

  • HB 934 by Rep. Lacombe corrects an unintended consequence from HB 571 last year, which intended to direct 30% of revenue from CCS projects on state owned to the local government but has been interpreted to exclude revenue sharing with local governments on CCS projects on state property operated by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. 
  • HB 516 by Rep. Mack imposes additional requirements and restrictions on CCS projects, including emergency response plans, community notification systems, maps of CCS facilities, locations of CCS facilities, and groundwater monitoring.  The bill received a long critique during House Committee before being advanced to the House floor, with the expectation by the committee members that the bill would receive significant amendments on the House floor.  

Stay tuned for further updates as these bills pass through.

Week 11

The Louisiana Legislative 2024 Regular Session has officially come to a close and five Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) bills were passed. The bills create a comprehensive legal framework for CCS projects, including clarifying eminent domain authority for CO2 pipelines, establishing unitization procedures for CCS reservoirs, providing liability protections for landowners, adjusting revenue sharing for local governments, and enhancing groundwater monitoring and community notifications. The passing of these bills represents a major step forward for CCS initiatives in Louisiana. The bills are detailed as follows:

  • HB 492 expressly provides eminent domain authority for pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide for CCS projects. HB 492 also provides a clear procedure for when and how that eminent domain authority can be obtained from the State of Louisiana, Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Office of Conservation (“DENR”). Prior to HB 492, Louisianaʼs expropriation statute was unclear as to whether eminent domain authority existed at all for pipelines relating to CCS projects, and if it existed, it was also unclear as to what approval was needed from the DENR to exercise that authority. While expressly providing and clarifying eminent domain authority for CCS transportation, HB 492 however removes existing eminent domain authority for storage operators relative to acquisition of pore space rights, which is being replaced by unitization as provided in a separate bill, HB 696, which also passed the legislature.
  • HB 696 creates the authority for unitization of CCS reservoirs, which is currently not allowed in Louisiana law for CCS projects. HB 696 follows a similar procedure for unitization which has historically existed in Louisiana for oil and gas projects. Under HB 696, unitization will be done by the Commissioner of Conservation upon application of a CCS operator. Notice and hearing procedures are included, plus a requirement that a minimum of 75% of pore space owners must be agreeable to unitization as a prerequisite to the application. All pore space owners who have not already entered into a contract with the storage operator will be compensated equitably with other members of the unit. HB 696 provides the Commissioner with authority to promulgate regulations to establish the fair and equitable compensation schedule.
  • HB 937 provides that landowners, by the mere fact of being landowners, cannot be held liable for any actions related to CCS projects on their property. HB 937 does not override any contractual obligations which might exist.
  • HB 934 corrects an unintended consequence from HB 571 last year, which intended to direct 30% of revenue to local governments which share geographic boundaries on CCS projects on state property. HB 571 from last year had been interpreted to exclude revenue sharing by local governments on CCS projects on certain state property, including property operated by the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
  • HB 516 imposes a semi-annual groundwater monitoring report and requires additional community notifications relating to emergency preparedness plans, receipt of permits, and maps/locations of CCS facilities.

The passage of these five bills highlights Louisiana’s commitment to innovation and sustainability and equips the State to lead the way in Carbon Capture & Storage projects.

AUTHORS

Neil Abramson | Shareholder, New Orleans

Neil Abramson is a registered Louisiana Lobbyist and an environmental litigator. He advocates on behalf of energy and environmental companies in legislative matters, including policies that promote increased economic growth and industrial development. Neil has recently worked with clients on policies involving renewable matters including carbon capture projects. Neil draws on his experience as the State Representative for the 98th District of Louisiana for 12 years as well as his involvement with the House Ways & Means Committee, the House Civil Law Committee, the Louisiana Commerce and Industry Board, and the Louisiana Law Institute Civil Procedure Committee.

Jeff-Lieberman-Bio

Jeff Lieberman | Shareholder, Lafayette

Jeff Lieberman is an energy lawyer who helps clients with title, conveyance, unitization, permitting, and regulatory issues related to oil and gas exploration and production, enhanced recovery, and carbon capture utilization and storage. Jeff regularly appears on behalf of clients before the Louisiana Commissioner of Conservation and the State Mineral and Energy Board in Baton Rouge. Companies turn to Jeff because of the firm’s top-tier reputation for handling complex unitization and regulatory matters, as well as providing efficient, high-caliber title opinions involving mineral transactions. Since the 1930s, Liskow has been building and maintaining a comprehensive title library that covers Louisiana, making mineral-related deals faster and more efficient and playing a key role in facilitating sales of thousands of acres.

WHAT’S TRENDING

  • Proposed Brine Legislation May Pave the Way for Louisiana Lithium Projects
    BLOG
    Proposed Brine Legislation May Pave the Way for Louisiana Lithium ProjectsWe are now seeing the Louisiana legislature address some of these uncertainties head on…
  • Environmental Groups Challenge Louisiana’s Primacy Over Class VI Injection Wells
    BLOG
    Environmental Groups Challenge Louisiana’s Primacy Over Class VI Injection WellsEnvironmental groups are asking the federal appellate courts to vacate the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”)…
  • Louisiana Granted Primacy Over Class VI Injection Wells
    BLOG
    Louisiana Granted Primacy Over Class VI Injection WellsAt long last, the State of Louisiana’s request to take over primary enforcement authority…

RELATED PRACTICE AREAS

Carbon Capture & Storage
Government Relations
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2025 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog