• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Louisiana Enacts New Laws Requiring Accommodations for Pregnant Employees and Restricting the Use of Criminal History in Hiring Decisions

07.30.21 | 3 minute read

Practices

  • Construction
  • Litigation

The Louisiana legislature has passed new laws requiring employers to provide accommodations for certain pregnant employees and limiting an employer’s use of an applicant’s criminal history in hiring decisions.  Both laws become effective on August 1, 2021.

Amendment to Pregnancy Accommodation Law

By Act No. 393 of the 2021 Regular Session, Louisiana’s nondiscrimination law protecting “pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions” in employment (La. R.S. 23:341–42), was amended to include a requirement that employers provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant employees.  The law, which is applicable to employers with more than 25 employees, makes it unlawful for a covered employer to:

  1. Fail or refuse to make reasonable accommodations for an applicant or employee with covered limitations unless the employer can show that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the business;
  2. Deny employment opportunities to a covered applicant or existing employee based on the need for reasonable accommodations;
  3. Require a covered applicant or existing employee to accept a reasonable accommodation they do not want or need;
  4. Require a covered employee to take leave under any leave law or policy if leave can be avoided through the provision of a reasonable accommodation; and
  5. Take adverse action against a covered employee for requesting or using a reasonable accommodation.

The new definitions section codified at La. R.S. 23:341.1 sets forth a non-exhaustive list of specific examples of “reasonable accommodations,” which includes:

  • Making existing facilities readily accessible to and usable by applicants or employees with covered limitations;
  • Providing scheduled and more frequent or longer compensated break periods;
  • Providing more frequent bathroom breaks;
  • Providing a private place, other than a bathroom stall, for the purpose of pumping breast milk;
  • Modifying the food or drink policy;
  • Providing seating or allowing applicants or employees with covered limitations to sit more frequently if the job requires them to stand;
  • Providing assistance with manual labor and imposing limits on lifting;
  • Temporarily transferring a covered employee to a less strenuous or hazardous vacant position for which they are qualified;
  • Providing job restructuring or light duty work if available;
  • Acquiring or modifying equipment or devices necessary to perform essential job functions; and
  • Modifying work schedules.

The new law, however, limits how far an employer must go to accommodate a covered applicant or employee.  Specifically, employers are not required to create additional employment opportunities or new positions or to discharge any employee, transfer any employee with more seniority, or promote an employee who is not qualified to perform the job, provided that the employer does not do so for any other employees or class of employees who need a reasonable accommodation.

Use of Background Checks in Hiring

Joining a growing list of states with “fair chance” laws intended to level the playing field for applicants with criminal histories, the Louisiana state legislature also passed Act 406, the first Louisiana law to directly regulate the use of criminal history in hiring decisions.

The law expressly prohibits employers from requesting or considering an applicant’s arrest record or charge that did not result in a conviction when making a hiring decision.

It also requires employers to make an “individual assessment” of whether an applicant’s other criminal history records have a “direct and adverse relationship with the specific duties of the job that may justify denying the applicant the position.”  It sets forth three considerations for employers making this assessment:

  1. The nature and gravity of the offense or conduct;
  2. The time that has elapsed since the offense, conduct, or conviction; and
  3. The nature of the job sought.

Additionally, the law mandates that an employer provide to an applicant any background check information used during the hiring process if the applicant makes a written request.

Conclusion

With both laws becoming effective in a matter of days, employers should become familiar with the requirements and update their hiring policies and practices accordingly.  If you have questions about the amendments to Louisiana’s pregnancy accommodations law or the new law regulating the use of criminal history in hiring decisions, please contact Liskow & Lewis’s employment law team.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Thomas J. McGoey II

    Thomas J. McGoey II

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6101504.299.6101
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog