• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

EPA and Army Corps Issue New Guidance for Implementing WOTUS Definition under Supreme Court’s Sackett Decision

03.14.25 | 3 minute read

Practices

  • Construction
  • Real Estate
  • Climate Change
  • Industrial Project Development

On March 12, 2025, EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued a joint memorandum providing guidance to field staff on implementing the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) as it pertains to “adjacent wetlands.”1 The memorandum represents a new iteration of the decades-old debate on the extent of Clean Water Act (CWA) authority over wetlands adjacent to jurisdictional navigable WOTUS. The previous iteration took place under the Biden Administration after the Supreme Court announced a two-part test in Sackett v. EPA. There, the Supreme Court held that CWA authority over WOTUS extends only to wetlands when: (1) the adjacent body of water is a “relatively permanent body of water connected to traditional interstate navigable waters” and (2) the wetland has “a continuous surface connection with that water, making it difficult to determine where the water ends and the wetland begins.” The new guidance narrows the scope of WOTUS by clarifying the current administration’s interpretation of when a wetland has a “continuous surface connection.”

The new guidance states that CWA authority will not extend to wetlands that are connected to jurisdictional waters by discrete features like non-jurisdictional ditches, swales, pipes, or culverts. It also explicitly rescinds any components of guidance or training materials that assumed a non-jurisdictional discrete feature established a continuous surface connection, citing materials compiled under the Biden Administration. The new guidance from the Trump Administration takes issue with such prior implementation, finding the “discrete features” language in tension with the “continuous surface connection” standard that Sackett set forth. EPA and the Army Corps now state that WOTUS includes “only those adjacent wetlands that have a continuous surface connection because they directly abut the [requisite jurisdictional water] (e.g., they are not separated by uplands, a berm, dike, or similar feature).”

In addition to the new guidance, EPA and the Army Corps issued a notice in the Federal Register regarding their intent to engage with stakeholders and gather recommendations on the meaning of key terms from Sackett, such as “relatively permanent” and “continuous surface connection,” to inform any potential future administrative actions to clarify the WOTUS definition and to ensure transparent, efficient, and predictable implementation.2 Stakeholders have challenged Biden-era implementation of CWA authority over adjacent wetlands in ongoing litigation, and the listening sessions are aimed at ensuring any potential, future action “will reflect consideration of the experiences of, and input received from, landowners, industry groups, the agricultural community, States, Tribes, local governments, community organizations, environmental groups, and the general public.”

The agencies will hold at least six listening sessions, with two open to all stakeholders, one open to States, one open to Tribes, one open to industry and agricultural stakeholders, and one open to environmental and conservational stakeholders. The listening sessions will be held as web and in-person conferences in late March-April 2025. Registration instructions and dates will be forthcoming at the following website here.

The listening sessions may lead to a more robust form of administrative action, such as a rulemaking to amend the existing regulations defining WOTUS, which would be more difficult for a future administration to reverse.

Liskow will be monitoring and covering further actions regarding the WOTUS definition under the new administration on Liskow’s The Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub. For more information on industry impacts and opportunities arising under the new administration, please contact Liskow attorneys Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu, and Colin North.


1Memorandum to the Field Between the Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA Concerning Proper Implementation of “Continuous Surface Connection” Under the Definition of “WOTUS” Under the CWA.

2 WOTUS Notice: The Final Response to SCOTUS.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Colin North

    Colin North

    Associate

    New Orleans
    504.556.4024504.556.4024
    995
  • Media item displaying: Greg L. Johnson

    Greg L. Johnson

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4115504.556.4115
    995
  • Media item displaying: Clare M. Bienvenu

    Clare M. Bienvenu

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4128504.556.4128
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog