• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

NLRB Finds Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements Unlawful

02.24.23 | 3 minute read

The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) ruled this week in the McLaren Macomb case, a decision applicable to both non-unionized and unionized employers, that merely including standard confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in a severance agreement violates the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”).  The new Biden administration Board found that such provisions “interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees’ exercise” of rights under Section 7 of the Act, which protects organization, joining a union, and “other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.” McLaren Macomb reverses Trump-era precedent allowing the use of confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses unless the employer separately committed an unfair labor practice by engaging in conduct that demonstrated anti-union or anti-organizing animus.

The McLaren Macomb hospital permanently furloughed eleven unionized employees during the Covid-19 pandemic. It presented the employees with a “Severance Agreement, Waiver and Release,” by which it offered to pay certain sums upon their execution of the document. The agreement released the employer from claims arising out of employment or termination of employment, proscribed disparagement of the employer, and required confidentiality as to the agreement’s terms.

The NLRB held that the mere proffer of a severance agreement having a “reasonable tendency to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights” violates the Act, regardless of whether the employee signs the agreement or other prohibited employer conduct surrounds the proffer. It ruled that the lawfulness of a severance agreement centers on its facial language and is not dependent on external circumstances surrounding the agreement, such as an employer’s demonstrated animus towards Section 7 activity or the unlawful discharge of an employee.  

What should employers do in response to the McLaren Macomb ruling? That depends on a number of factors, including risk tolerance. It should be noted that executives, managers, supervisors, and independent contractors are not covered by the Act, and thus should not be impacted by McLaren Macomb. As to employees who do not manage or supervise departments or other employees, options include: using more limited confidentiality clauses that focus on trade secrets and truly proprietary documents/information; adding express disclaimers that nothing in the agreement is intended to impact rights under the Act; and eliminating non-disparagement provisions or reducing them to the type of relatively egregious conduct that the Board has deemed not protected under the Act. As to past agreements, employers have an argument that agreements made while Trump-era precedent was in effect should be immune from challenge based on McLaren Macomb.  Contact Tommy McGoey, Leon Rittenberg, Courtney Turkington, Kindall James, or Ben Parks for assistance in developing your company’s best approach to severance agreements and the issues raised by McLaren Macomb.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Thomas J. McGoey II

    Thomas J. McGoey II

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6101504.299.6101
    995
  • Media item displaying: Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6135504.299.6135
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog