• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
Blogs

Murphy Oil Spill Class Settlement Approved

02.06.07 | 2 minute read

 

On January 30, 2007, a class action settlement was approved in Turner v. Murphy Oil U.S.A., Inc., 05-4206 (E.D. La).  The Turner case asserted claims for property damage resulting from a release of oil from tanks located at Murphy’s Meraux, Louisiana refinery after Hurricane Katrina.  The $330 million settlement includes a $55 million buyout program, a $120 million compensation program, a credit for $83 million in compensation already paid, and a $71 million remediation program (including credit for $51 million already expended for remediation).  In addition, Murphy agreed to pay plaintiffs’ attorneys fees, which the court set at $33.7 million.  The Governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, testified in favor of the settlment at the Fairness Hearing.  To view the Court’s order approving the settlement, click here.

As a result of the breaches and overtopping of levees during Katrina, floodwaters up to 12 feet high swept into the Murphy Refinery, dislodging Tank 250-2, which ultimately ruptured.  Approximately 25,000 barrels of oil were released, and washed by floodwaters into the residential neighborhoods surrounding the refinery.  The court found that at least 1,800 properties were affected. 

Numerous suits were filed, and 27 class actions were consolidated under the Turner caption.  The court certified a class of residents and property owners within a designated geographic area.  The claims certified for class treatment included negligence, strict liability, violation of obligations of neighborhood, nuisance, trespass and groundwater contamination.  Plaintiffs’ claims under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and Oil Pollution Act (OPA) were dismissed as premature.  The court also dismissed claims for “fear of cancer” damages and allegations of fraud.  The court bifurcated the case into two phases:  trial common issues of liability and causation, to be followed by successive trials of specific causation and damages.  However, the parties reached settlement before trial. 

While the settlement amount was established in the Settlement Agreement, the amount of attorneys fees was not agreed upon.  The agreement provided only that Murphy would pay attorney fees and expenses on top of the settlement amount.  Plaintiffs’ counsel requested a 35% contingency fee, or $115 million, and Murphy countered that $13.6 million would be appropriate.  The court awarded $33.7 million in fees and $2.6 million in expenses.

Primary Sidebar

Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog