• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
    • Energy Law Blog
    • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
    • Maritime Law Blog
    • Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub
Blogs

MARAD Proposes First Major Overhaul of Capital Construction Fund Regulations in Nearly 50 Years

09.25.26 | 2 minute read

Featured Image

The Maritime Administration (MARAD) has published a notice of proposed rulemaking that would substantially revise the regulations governing the Capital Construction Fund (CCF) Program, found at 46 CFR Part 390. Published in the Federal Register on September 22, 2026, this is the first comprehensive update to the CCF regulations since MARAD first introduced them in 1976.

The CCF Program allows owners and operators of U.S. flagged vessels to defer federal income tax on earnings deposited into a CCF account, provided those funds are ultimately used to construct, reconstruct, or acquire qualifying vessels. Deferred taxes are eventually recovered when a vessel financed with CCF funds is sold, since the vessel’s cost basis is reduced by the amount of CCF funds used unless the proceeds are re-deposited into a CCF account. As of the proposed rule, there were 129 active CCF Agreements holding approximately $2.56 billion on deposit.

The proposed rule conforms MARAD’s regulations to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, which extended CCF Program eligibility to all U.S. built vessels engaged in either domestic or foreign commerce, eliminating prior restrictions limiting the program to certain geographic trades. Because the existing regulatory text was never updated to reflect this expansion, vessel owners have faced confusion and administrative burden, including outdated liquidated damages provisions tied to now obsolete trading restrictions.

The proposed rule also introduces a new mechanism to automatically terminate CCF Agreements that have gone inactive. Specifically, agreements where a program objective has not commenced within ten years, or where the account balance has fallen to zero for ten years without an active objective, the Agreement will terminate automatically. MARAD explains that many existing agreements were established years ago for projects that are no longer viable, leaving account holders to either let funds sit idle or make a non-qualified withdrawal and pay deferred taxes at the highest marginal rate.

Other notable changes include clarifying the maximum completion time for reconstruction projects, expanding the ability to use CCF funds for vessel acquisitions, and raising the minimum reconstruction program threshold from a strict $1,000,000 per-vessel requirement to a more flexible $3,000,000 threshold that can be met by aggregating the costs of multiple smaller vessels. MARAD estimates this could open the program to smaller operators, since over 80 percent of the roughly 1,800 operators on the nation’s inland waterways run ten or fewer vessels and were previously excluded by the per-vessel minimum.

There are a number of other rule changes.  Some are less favorable to account holders.  For example, historically, MARAD allowed a CCF account holder to purchase used vessels with CCF funds as part of a CCF program (even if the vessels were not substantially reconstructed).  

Comments on the proposed rule are due within 60 days of publication. Vessel owners, operators, and shipyards currently participating in or considering the CCF Program should review the proposed regulatory text closely, particularly the new automatic termination provisions, since existing account holders with inactive or zero balance agreements may need to take affirmative steps to preserve their agreements once the rule is finalized. For more information about this update, contact Liskow attorneys Leon Rittenberg III and Kevin Naccari, and visit Liskow’s Tax Practice page.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6135504.299.6135
  • Media item displaying: Kevin Naccari

    Kevin Naccari

    Associate

    New Orleans
    504.556.4033504.556.4033
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog