• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Louisiana is “Open for Business,” but Projects Need to Proceed Carefully

01.17.25 | 3 minute read

Practices

  • Construction
  • Climate Change
  • Industrial Project Development
  • Wind Energy

On December 10, 2024, President-elect Donald Trump promised expedited permitting for energy and other construction projects worth more than $1 billion. While there have been no details of how this would practically look, it reflects the incoming administration’s focus on promoting industrial growth. This may make permitting on the federal level a quicker and easier process for industrial projects.

This is especially so in Louisiana, where the current state administration is also trying to attract and retain energy and industrial projects. For example, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality has suggested providing an even faster permit review process (dubbed “Super Duper Fast” permitting) for projects supported by Louisiana Economic Development. This could lead to quicker government engagement and support for such projects at both the state and federal levels.

Moreover, administration changes are likely to be magnified by court decisions in the coming year. While environmental assessments are required under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), the exact limits and process for doing so may be changed by upcoming court decisions. The United State Supreme Court is poised to better define the boundaries of what must be considered in a NEPA assessment, and the DC Circuit Court of Appeals has suggested that the overarching NEPA regulations, promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality, cannot be binding on how other federal agencies implement NEPA.

Much remains to be seen regarding how this will play out on the ground level, and we will be carefully monitoring policy and regulatory developments. While these reforms could result in a swifter permitting process, what will not change are the standards for judicial review of these permitting decisions. Proposed projects will still need to satisfy the legal requirements for industrial permitting, perhaps especially if the state and federal agencies fast track such decisions. Permittees must prioritize having complete and defensible decision records for any issued permits because the change in priorities at the federal level is expected to increase permit challenges from non-government organizations and judicial scrutiny of those decisions remains rigorous.

For assistance in project development and permitting, please contact Lou Buatt, Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu and Emily von Qualen and follow along Liskow’s The Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub for regular updates in the industrial project development landscape in Louisiana.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewisʼ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Emily von Qualen

    Emily von Qualen

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4129504.556.4129
    995
  • Media item displaying: Lou E. Buatt

    Lou E. Buatt

    Shareholder

    Lafayette
    337.267.2343337.267.2343
    995
  • Media item displaying: Greg L. Johnson

    Greg L. Johnson

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4115504.556.4115
    995
  • Media item displaying: Clare M. Bienvenu

    Clare M. Bienvenu

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4128504.556.4128
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog