• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
Blogs

Latest Developments on Louisiana CCS Legislation

05.08.25 | 3 minute read

Featured Image

 

After two action-packed weeks at the Capitol, Louisiana lawmakers continued to vote down bills this week on carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), but did advance a few CCS bills out of committee.

The House Committee on Ways & Means heard and handled the following bill:

  • HB 444 (Mack) which seeks to impose a $3/per metric ton injection tax on CCS projects and dedicate the money to local governments. The Committee deferred ruling on the bill.

The House Committee on Natural Resources & Environment also heard and handled the following bills:

  • HB 75 (McCormick) which provides for pore space owners who are unitized to receive the highest compensation paid to any other pore space owner.
    • Passed favorable but after significant amendments. The bill was amended to provide a pore space owner who is unitized into a CCS project with compensation which is at least the average of the amounts contractually provided to other pore space owners. The bill was also amended to require CCS operators to compensate mineral rights owners in a unit who do not have pore space agreements with the storage operator with either the value of the lost mineral rights or any additional expenses required by LDENR to drill through the storage unit to access the minerals.
  • HB 304 (Carter) which provides for local venue for claims involving expropriation for carbon capture sequestration.
    • Passed favorable. Existing law already provides for local venue within the state’s general expropriation statute, so this bill appears to simply re-state existing law within the CCS statute itself.
  • HB 396 (McCormick) which declares carbon capture sequestration illegal
    • Did not pass.
  • HB 548 (Lacombe) which provides for dedication of revenue to local governments on carbon capture sequestration on certain state lands and water bottoms
    • Passed favorably.
  • HB 585 (McCormick) which requires advance notice to surface and minerals owners prior to permitting carbon capture sequestration
    • Did not pass.
  • HB 632 (Riser) which treats mineral rights owners in the same capacity as surface owners for purposes of carbon capture sequestration
    • Did not pass but may come back for hearing next week.
  • HB 601 (Geymann) which seeks to eliminate the use of eminent domain for CCS pipelines
    • Passed favorably. Chairman Geymann’s bill was added back to the agenda the day before the committee hearing. HB 601 was heard in committee last week and tied on a 8-8 vote. This week HB 601 passed committee on a 11-4 vote. Based on comments made during the meeting, the bill appears to have advanced out of committee with the understanding that the bill will be amended on the House floor. Stay tuned on amendment discussions.

Next week, the following bills are scheduled to be heard in the House Committee on Ways & Means:

  • HB 444 (Mack) which seeks to impose an injection tax on CCS projects is back on the agenda for Monday, May 12 at 9:00 a.m. It is anticipated that the bill will be amended to reduce the current assessment in the bill from $3/per metric ton to a lower number.  Stay tuned.
  • HB 646 (Carter) which seeks to impose an excise tax on CCS projects, at a rate of 30% of a storage operator’s gross proceeds, is scheduled for on Tuesday, May 13 at 9:00 a.m.  HB 646 will likely take a back seat to HB 444, as HB 444 is expected to be the bill which may advance on the issue of taxing CCS projects.

Four local option bills on CCS remain pending in the House Committee on Municipal, Parochial, and Cultural Affairs. Two of those four bills are currently scheduled to be heard on May 15 at 9:00 a.m.

While the House Committee on Natural Resources & Environment appears to be done with bills on CCS, and it is unlikely more bills will be scheduled, the committee has not posted its schedule for next week.

Follow along Liskow attorney and Louisiana lobbyist Neil Abramson and Liskow CCS attorney Jeff Lieberman as they continue to monitor for these schedule and bill updates on the 2025 Liskow CCS Legislative Update page.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Neil Abramson
  • Jeff Lieberman
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog