• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
    • Energy Law Blog
    • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
    • Maritime Law Blog
    • Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub
Blogs

IRS Proposes to Ease Form 1041-A Filing Burden for Trusts With Passthrough Charitable Deductions

08.17.26 | 3 minute read

Featured Image

The Treasury Department and IRS have issued proposed regulations that would eliminate an information-return filing requirement for certain trusts whose only charitable contribution deductions flow from a partnership or S corporation in which the trust holds an interest. The proposed rule, published for public inspection under REG-109082-25 and scheduled for formal publication in the Federal Register on August 17, 2026, responds directly to complaints from practitioners that the current filing requirement imposes an unnecessary burden on trustees who may not even be aware it applies to them.

Under existing law, a trust other than a simple trust can generally deduct amounts of gross income that are, under its governing instrument, paid for a charitable purpose described in Section 170(c) of the tax code. Section 6034 requires trusts claiming this deduction, or split-interest trusts described in Section 4947(a)(2), to file an annual information return reporting details about the deduction, including amounts previously deducted but not yet paid out and a full balance sheet of trust assets and liabilities. The reporting requirement, dating back to the Revenue Act of 1950, was designed to let the IRS confirm that charitable deductions claimed for accumulated trust income are eventually actually paid to charity and are not claimed more than once.

The problem the new proposal addresses is that this same reporting obligation currently sweeps in trusts that never accumulated any charitable funds of their own at all. When a trust owns an interest in a partnership or S corporation that makes a charitable contribution, the trust picks up its allocable share of that deduction under Sections 702 or 1366 of the Code, even though the trust itself never received or held the contributed funds and made no independent decision to give to charity. Commenters argued that requiring these pass-through recipient trusts to complete the same Form 1041-A as trusts actively accumulating charitable funds serves no real enforcement purpose while creating real administrative headaches, particularly for trustees unfamiliar with the obscure filing requirement.

The proposed regulations would add a new exception under Treasury Regulation Section 1.6034-1(b), relieving a trust of the Form 1041-A filing requirement for any taxable year in which its only Section 642(c) deduction results from a passthrough contribution reported to it on a Schedule K-1. The proposal would also fix a longstanding technical inconsistency in the regulations: current rules still direct split-interest trusts described in Section 4947(a)(2) to file Form 1041-A, even though Form 5227 has actually replaced that form for such trusts since 2007 following the Pension Protection Act. The proposed regulations would formally update the text to require split-interest trusts to file Form 5227 instead.

Treasury and the IRS have designated the rule as deregulatory under Executive Order 14192 and confirmed it is not economically significant. If finalized, the changes would apply to taxable years ending on or after the date final regulations are published, though trusts and split-interest trusts may rely on the proposed rules for earlier taxable years in the meantime. Trustees and fiduciary advisors whose trusts hold interests in partnerships or S corporations with charitable giving programs should review their current Form 1041-A filing practices in light of this proposal and consider submitting comments if the change would affect their compliance obligations. For more information about this update, contact Liskow attorneys Leon Rittenberg III, Caroline Lafourcade, and Kevin Naccari, and visit Liskow’s Tax Practice page.

Primary Sidebar

Related Practices

  • Tax
  • Corporate

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6135504.299.6135
  • Media item displaying: Caroline Lafourcade

    Caroline Lafourcade

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4035504.556.4035
  • Media item displaying: Kevin Naccari

    Kevin Naccari

    Associate

    New Orleans
    504.556.4033504.556.4033
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog