• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs

EPA Biting Off More Than It Can Chew? Agency Publishes First Year Implementation Plan for New TSCA Legislation

07.18.16 | 3 minute read

This is Part II of our TSCA update following the recent changes to the TSCA legislation.

On June 29, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) released its first year implementation plan for the recently-enacted amendments to the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”).  Faced with the ambitious requirements and timeframes laid out by the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (the “Act”), EPA has planned out its implementation activities during the first year. The agency divided up actions into four categories: Immediate Actions, Framework Actions, Early Mandatory Actions, and Later Mandatory Actions (beyond the first year of implementation).

Immediate Actions

From Day 1, EPA has to make an affirmative determination of safety before the manufacture of new chemicals (or significant new uses of chemicals) can commence.  For notices received prior to enactment, EPA’s goal is to complete the review within the remaining time under the original deadline, but in any event no later than 90 days from enactment.  The first 30 days will see a number of actions related to the Confidential Business Information (“CBI”) process.  Specifically, EPA will create a plan for linking confidential business information to a unique identifier, develop an approach for routine review of confidentiality claims, and provide additional information on statements and certifications required for CBI claims.  Within the next six months, EPA will issue risk management rules for three solvents: Trichloroethylene or TCE, Methylene Chloride, and N-Methylpyrrolidone or NMP.

Framework Actions

A number of proposed rules expected in the next six months will provide the framework for new regulatory processes required by the Act, including prioritization of chemicals for risk evaluation, evaluation of the risk of high priority chemicals, fee collection, and inventory reporting.  In the next six months, EPA also plans to issue the initial list of ten chemicals to undergo risk evaluations and create a new Science Advisory Committee on chemicals.

Early Mandatory Actions

EPA also expects to take action on a number of early mandatory requirements.  EPA will publish a list of mercury compounds prohibited from export by mid-September of this year.  Within the next six months, the agency will review the “small business” definition for purposes of TSCA and submit the first TSCA implementation report to Congress.  Finally, the plan for the first year of enactment also includes publishing the scope of evaluation for the first 10 chemicals, preparing the agency’s first annual plan for risk evaluation of chemicals, and publishing an inventory of mercury in commerce.

Beyond the first year of implementation, EPA will be required to issue additional rules on mercury reporting and CBI substantiation, as well as come up with a strategy for alternative testing methods.  There may be some doubt about whether EPA can meet all these aggressive implementation goals, but one thing is for sure: the regulated community can expect a lot of regulatory development in this area for the foreseeable future.

A copy of EPA’s First Year Implementation Plan can be found here.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue.  By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site.  The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Greg L. Johnson
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog