• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

EJ Evolution: Proposed NEPA Regulations Spotlight Environmental Justice

08.04.23 | 5 minute read

Practices

  • Construction
  • Climate Change
  • Environmental Justice
  • Wind Energy

 

 

On July 31, 2023, the Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”) published proposed changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) regulations. These proposed changes are “Phase 2” of the Biden Administration’s response to 2020 changes promulgated by the Trump Administration.  Among other changes such as simplified documentation requirements and consolidated decision-making, the Phase 2 changes focus on environmental justice (“EJ”), community engagement, climate change, and ease of permitting for renewable energy projects.[1] Significantly, these changes, for the first time, specifically include “environmental justice” in the NEPA process and provide a definition. If promulgated, these regulations would codify the Biden Administration’s emphasis on EJ, and they could provide greater stability and clarity for persons preparing NEPA analyses.  

While EJ has been a requirement in NEPA reviews since Executive Order 12898 was signed in 1994, it has not been specifically included in or defined by regulations. These proposed regulations change that. CEQ proposes to define “environmental justice” as: 

(k) Environmental justice means the just treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of income, race, color, national origin, Tribal affiliation, or disability, in agency decision-making and other Federal activities that affect human health and the environment so that people: 

(1) Are fully protected from disproportionate and adverse human health and environmental effects including risks and hazards, including those related to climate change, the cumulative impacts of environmental and other burdens, and the legacy of racism or other structural or systemic barriers; and 

(2) Have equitable access to a healthy, sustainable, and resilient environment in which to live, play, work, learn, grow, worship, and engage in cultural and subsistence practices. 

40 C.F.R. 1508.1(k) (proposed). This definition matches the definition used in Executive Order 14096, signed April 21, 2023, which directed an all-of-government approach to incorporate EJ, including incorporating it into the NEPA process. Of note, because it adds Tribal affiliation and disability to the list of EJ indicators, explicitly provides for protection from disproportionate and adverse human health and environmental effects, and states that those effects include those from climate change, as well as cumulative impacts, this definition is more expansive than the current working definition used by the Environmental Protection Agency.[2]

In addition to defining “environmental justice,” CEQ is seeking input on whether to define “communities with environmental justice concerns” in the regulations. This phrase is used throughout the proposed regulations, but CEQ did not include a proposed definition. CEQ explains that the term means “communities that do not experience environmental justice as defined in § 1508.1. (k),” and CEQ is specifically asking for comments on whether and how the regulations should define the term.

The proposed regulations also specifically incorporate EJ in the major steps of the NEPA process:

  • Policy. CEQ proposes to repromulgate Section 1500.2 (Policy). The new section would add language that NEPA’s policy of encouraging and facilitating public involvement should specifically include communities with environmental justice concerns, 40 C.F.R. § 1500.2(d) (proposed) and that the policy of identifying and assessing reasonable alternatives should include “alternatives that will reduce climate change-related effects or address adverse health and environmental effects that disproportionately affect communities with environmental justice concerns.” § 1500.2(e) (proposed).
  • Determining the Appropriate Level of NEPA Review. Under Section 1501.3, agencies are directed to determine whether an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement is required for the federal action based on whether the federal action is likely to have significant effects. CEQ proposes to add the following factor when analyzing the intensity of the effects of a federal action: “The degree to which the action may have disproportionate and adverse effects on communities with environmental justice concerns.” § 1501.3(d)(2)(ix) (proposed). In the preamble to the proposed regulations, CEQ explains that this factor was listed because “communities with environmental justice concerns often experience disproportionate environmental burdens such as pollution or urban heat stress, and often experience disproportionate health and other socio-economic burdens that make them more susceptible to adverse effects.” 88 Fed. Reg. 49936. Additionally, in the proposed definition for “effects” or “impacts,” CEQ clarifies that the effects include cumulative effects and they include “disproportionate and adverse effects on communities with environmental justice concerns, whether direct, indirect, or cumulative.” 40 C.F.R. § 1508.1(g)(4) (proposed).
  • Environmental Impact Statement. In the proposed regulations, CEQ clarifies that the discussion of environmental consequences in an EIS must include “[t]he potential for disproportionate and adverse human health and environmental effects on communities with environmental justice concerns.” 40 C.F.R. § 1502.16(a)(14).
  • Mitigation. The proposed regulations also provide that the lead agency should consider mitigation for adverse effects on communities with environmental justice concerns. Id. § 1505.3(b). Specifically, the lead agency should:

where relevant and appropriate incorporate mitigation measures that address or ameliorate significant adverse human health and environmental effects of proposed Federal actions that disproportionately and adversely affect communities with environmental justice concerns.

These changes largely codify the Biden administration’s current practice of including EJ in the NEPA analysis. If promulgated, however, EJ’s incorporation will not be dependent on an Executive Order, which could be subject to change based on the administration. These changes signal an upcoming first, a fixed place for EJ in federal law. This will create a lasting need for the industry to consider EJ concerns and potential mitigations when seeking or renewing permits, including under a potentially expanded definition of environmental justice. Comments on the proposed regulations are due by September 29, 2023.


[1]        The Phase 1 changes were published on April 20, 2022, and then were implemented on May 20, 2022. The substantial revisions made were: (1) the definition of “effects” used for the purpose of environmental impact statements was amended; (2) additional detail of the purpose and need of a project or action was required; (3) the agency review process as a minimum standard for environmental review procedures was established.

[2]        EPA has defined EJ as “the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.”

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Emily von Qualen

    Emily von Qualen

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4129504.556.4129
    995
  • Media item displaying: Clare M. Bienvenu

    Clare M. Bienvenu

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4128504.556.4128
    995
  • Media item displaying: Greg L. Johnson

    Greg L. Johnson

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4115504.556.4115
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog