• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
Blogs

Court of Chancery of Delaware Validates Asset Protection Trust Laws

08.11.25 | 2 minute read

The Court of Chancery of Delaware recently validated the Delaware asset protection trust laws and rejected a creditor’s attempt to seize assets held in a Delaware asset protection trust in order to enforce a $14 million judgment from Michigan against the trust’s grantor. In the Matter of the CES 2007 Trust. The creditor alleged that the trust was merely a facade used to conceal assets, with the grantor still exercising control.

The Court emphasized that the trust had been established in 2007—before the debt arose—and held 90% ownership in various Delaware LLCs, which in turn owned real estate. According to Delaware law, holding an interest in an LLC does not equate to owning the underlying property, so the trust was not deemed to own the real estate directly.

The Court found that the trust complied with all statutory requirements for a valid Delaware asset protection trust: it was irrevocable, included a legally enforceable spendthrift provision, was managed by a qualified Delaware trustee, and was governed by Delaware law. Although the grantor retained certain investment advisory powers and appointed his brother as trust protector, the Court ruled that these elements were permissible under Delaware law and did not render the trust invalid or suggest that the grantor retained control.

Additionally, the Court found no evidence of fraudulent conduct or mismanagement. The grantor’s role in managing the LLCs did not, in the Court’s view, justify disregarding the trust’s protections. Without concrete evidence of wrongdoing, the Court refused to treat the trust as a sham or to “pierce the veil.”

This ruling reinforces the strength of Delaware’s asset protection trust laws, confirming that adherence to the formal legal requirements can shield trusts from creditor claims—even those based on judgments from other states—unless there is clear evidence of fraud or abuse. For further questions regarding the bill, contact Liskow attorneys Leon Rittenberg III, Caroline Lafourcade,  John Rouchell, and Kevin Naccari and visit our Tax practice page.

 

Primary Sidebar

Related Practices

  • Litigation

Related Team

  • Caroline Lafourcade
  • John A. Rouchell
  • Kevin Naccari
  • Leon H. Rittenberg III
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog