• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Texas Court Rules Lease’s Retained Acreage Clause Incorporates Drilling Unit Size of Statewide Density Rule 38, ConocoPhillips Must Release 15,351 Acres to Lessor

08.19.15 | 3 minute read

Practices

  • Litigation

A Texas appeals court recently ruled in ConocoPhillips Company v. Vaquillas Unproven Minerals, Ltd. that a lease’s retained acreage clause invoked the Texas Railroad Commission’s field spacing rule as well as the statewide drilling unit rule, Rule 38, which operated to reduce the acreage the lessee was permitted to retain under the lease from 640 acres per well to 40 acres per well. The effect of the ruling was that ConocoPhillips was ordered to release an additional 15,351 acres to the lessor.

In this case, ConocoPhillips was the lessee under two oil and gas leases, one covering 26,622.79 acres and the other covering 6,740 acres. Both of the leases contained a retained acreage clause which set the number of acres around each gas well that ConocoPhillips would be allowed to retain once its continuous drilling program ended:

 . . . Lessee covenants and agrees to . . . release . . . any and all portions of this lease which have not been drilled to a density of at least 40 acres for each producing oil well and 640 acres for each producing or shut-in gas well, except that in case any rule adopted by the Railroad Commission of Texas or any other regulating authority for any field on this lease provides for such a spacing or proration establishing different units of acreage per well, then such established different units shall be held under this lease by such production, in lieu of the 40 and 640-acre units above mentioned. . . .

It was undisputed that ConocoPhillips’ drilling program had ended, and it had apparently already released all acreage in excess of 640 acres per gas well. Because the retained acreage clause provided that its default allowance of 640 acres per gas well could be overridden by a field rule establishing a spacing or proration unit of a different size, the issue was whether such a rule had been adopted for the applicable field which would operate to reduce the acreage ConocoPhillips would be entitled to retain.

The only relevant rule for the field was a spacing rule which provided:

Rule 2. No well shall hereafter be drilled nearer than [467] feet to any property line, lease line or subdivision line and no well shall be drilled nearer than [1,200] feet to any applied for, permitted or completed well in the same reservoir on the same lease, pooled unit or unitized tract. . . .

The question thus became whether the spacing requirement of Rule 2 established a “different unit[] of acreage per well” than the 640 acres provided by the retained acreage clause. While the court of appeals agreed with ConocoPhillips that Rule 2 did not expressly set forth a unit of acreage, it found that the field rule must be read in conjunction with statewide Rule 38, which establishes the standard drilling unit size for gas fields in which “only spacing rules” exist, including field-specific spacing rules such as Rule 2. For fields in which the spacing requirement is 467/1200, as was the case for the field at issue per Rule 2, Rule 38(b) provides that the standard drilling unit is 40 acres per well.

The court concluded that Rule 2, read in conjunction with Rule 38, was a field spacing rule that established “different units of acreage per well” than that provided for in the retained acreage clause. Thus, the standard 40-acre drilling unit rule controlled the number of acres ConocoPhillips was entitled to retain under the leases. The Fourth Court of Appeals therefore affirmed the trial court’s ruling that ConocoPhillips had breached the leases by failing to release all acreage in excess of 40 acres for each gas well, resulting in a release of an additional 15,351 acres.

Primary Sidebar

Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog