• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Texas Court of Appeals Rules on Permission Needed for Off-Lease Horizontal Drilling

09.02.15 | 3 minute read

The Fourth Court of Appeals recently held that surface owners control the matrix of the underlying earth; thus, a surface owner can give permission to drill through the subsurface to an adjacent lease. In Lightning Oil Co. v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, No. 04-14-00903-CV, 2014 Tex. App. Lexis 8673 (Aug. 19, 2015), Anadarko leased the mineral estate under the Chaparral Wildlife Management Area (CWMA), and entered into a Surface Use and Subsurface Easement Agreement (Agreement) with the adjacent surface estate owners. The Agreement allowed Anadarko to place a drilling rig on the surface and to drill through the earth to form wells that open and bottom in the CWMA. Lightning held a mineral lease on the adjacent estate, and upon learning of Anadarko’s plan, sought an injunction. Following discovery, both Anadarko and Lightning moved for summary judgment on the claims of trespass and tortious interference with a contract. The trial court granted Anadarko’s motion for summary judgment, denied Lightning’s motion for summary judgment, and severed the remaining issues. Lightning appealed to the Fourth Court of Appeals.

Lightning argued that the surface owner’s permission to drill was not enough and declared its right to exclude others from drilling as the leaseholder of the mineral estate. Lightning also emphasized that it should not have to trust Anadarko to refrain from performing seismic surveys as it drilled through the subterranean structures to reach the CWMA. Lightning asserted claims for trespass and tortious interference with a contract. Anadarko, in turned, argued that the surface owners controlled the subterranean structures; thus, their permission is all that is needed to drill through Lightning’s mineral estate and claims of trespass and tortious interference must fail as a matter of law.

The court agreed with Anadarko and found that there was no evidence of an essential element of trespass, the right to exclude others from the earth surrounding the oil and gas for which Lightning has an exclusive right to explore, develop, operate, produce, own, market, treat, and transport according to its mineral lease. A mineral “‘lessee’s interest is a separate, real interest, amount[ing] to a defeasible title in fee to the oil and gas in the ground.’” Yet, the court held that the mineral lessee does not own the earth in which the mineral estate is contained. “The surface estate owner controls the earth beneath the surface estate.” The mineral estate only includes the minerals and does not give the mineral owner ownership of the earth surrounding those substances. Additionally, a conveyance of the mineral rights does not convey the entirety of the subsurface. Consequently, the surface estate owner owns all non-mineral molecules of the land. Texas precedent established that the mineral interest owner may not exclude others from drilling through its estate.

According to the court of appeals’ decision, there was also no evidence that Anadarko would conduct a seismographic survey which could constitute a trespass under Texas law. Moreover, Lightning offered no evidence that Anadarko has bottomed or opened a well within Lightning’s lease. Absent proof of these actions and without the right to exclude Anadarko from drilling through Lightning’s mineral estate, Lightning’s claim of trespass failed.

Lightning’s claim of tortious interference with a contract similarly failed. Anadarko established an affirmative defense of justification. A defendant is justified in his actions when he (1) acts within his own legal rights or (2) has a good faith claim to a colorable legal right, even if the claim ultimately fails. Here, the court ruled that Anadarko was within its own legal right granted by the surface estate owners to drill through the earth within in the boundaries of Lightning’s mineral lease to its mineral estate on the CWMA.

This decision has a significant impact on the practice of horizontal well drilling. It is common for operators to drill multiple horizontal wells from one drill pad. Lightning Oil Co. establishes the permission needed to drill from off-lease well pads.

Primary Sidebar

Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog