• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Ninth Circuit Vacates EPA Rule Excepting Oil and Gas Construction Discharges from NPDES Permitting

06.25.08 | 3 minute read

 

By Claire Bienvenu

On May 23, 2008, the Ninth Circuit vacated EPA’s rule exempting discharges of sediment resulting from oil and gas construction activities from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. NRDC v. EPA, No. 06-73217 (9th Cir. 5/23/08).  The Ninth Circuit found EPA’s rule, which was a codification of a recent exemption added to the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), to be an impermissible interpretation of the Act. Unless overturned, the court’s decision to vacate the regulation imposes an unexpected obligation on the oil and gas industry to obtain NPDES permits for all construction activities disturbing land area greater than or equal to one acre in size. 

            The Decision

            EPA’s final rule implemented an amendment to the Clean Water Act’s definition of “oil and gas exploration and production” that was contained in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The new definition of “oil and gas exploration and production” includes “construction activities,” which brings oil and gas construction activities within the CWA § 402(l)(2) exemption from NPDES permitting. Section 402(l)(2) exempts discharges from oil and gas E&P activities that are composed of flows that “do not come into contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate products, finished product, byproduct, or waste products.” In order to revise its codification of this statutory exemption to include discharges from construction activities, EPA revised 40 C.F.R. §122.26(a)(2) to provide that sediment discharged from oil and gas construction activities would not require NPDES permits, even if the discharge contributed to a violation of the water quality standard.

            The Ninth Circuit used the following Chevron two step analysis to vacate the regulation. The court first found that there was no clear indication from Congress that it intended to exempt “sediment” discharges from permitting requirements, because the word “sediment” did not appear anywhere in the statute. Instead, Congress only exempted discharges from construction activities where the runoff is not contaminated with the specified contaminants. Citing former EPA guidance, the Court secondly found that EPA’s rule was arbitrary and capricious because it conflicted with EPA’s historical position that sediment constituted “contamination” under CWA § 402(l)(2). The Ninth Circuit rejected EPA’s argument that Congress intended to exempt sediment because it is the pollutant most commonly associated with construction activities.

            The Effect

            The exemption of sediment discharges from NPDES permitting requirements has been available to oil and gas construction activities since the final rule’s issuance on June 12, 2006. However, the Ninth Circuit’s decision to vacate the rule leaves oil and gas companies without the exemption, at least for the time being, unless the decision is overturned on possible rehearing or appeal to the Supreme Court.

            The Ninth Circuit’s decision has particular impact on small oil and gas construction activities (those that disturb one to five acres) because they have not previously been required to obtain an NPDES permit.  Small oil and gas construction activities have not needed an NPDES permit because the NPDES permit authorization deadline for small construction activities was June 12, 2006, the same day on which EPA’s final rule excepting sediment discharges from NPDES permitting was promulgated. However, now that the small oil and gas construction activities deadline has passed and there is no exemption available, these construction activities require an NPDES permit. As for large construction activities, they previously required NPDES permits (prior to June 12, 2006). After a brief period of exemption, they require a permit once again. 

            An EPA Stormwater Construction General Permit is available for these activities. However, oil and gas companies in states that have received NPDES delegation must obtain permits through the state programs. These states enact their own general permits, and the status of these state permits vary throughout the country. In those instances where no general permit is available, oil and gas construction activities will need to obtain individual NPDES permits. 

            Stay tuned for further developments.

Primary Sidebar

Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog