• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
Blogs

LDEQ Releases Louisiana’s First-Ever Voluntary Environmental Self-Audit Program

02.21.24 | 5 minute read

On December 20, 2023, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (“LDEQ”) issued regulations implementing the state’s first-ever voluntary environmental self-audit program. Pursuant to La. R.S. § 30:2044, the regulations provide for the reduction or elimination of civil penalties for certain violations disclosed to LDEQ as the result of a voluntary environmental self-audit. The regulations describe the types of violations that are eligible for penalty reduction; the pre-requisites that must be met for a 75% or 100% penalty reduction; and required notices, including notice prior to the self-audit, in order to qualify for the program. The regulations also provide for other miscellaneous provisions, such as those relating to confidentiality of documents and prescription of violations. Louisiana’s self-audit program is similar to others of its kind, including the EPA’s Audit Policy and Texas’s Environmental, Health, and Safety Audit Privilege Act. There are, however, key differences among the three programs regarding eligibility, incentives, and confidentiality.   

Eligible Types of Violations. Discovered violations that are not excluded under the regulations may be eligible for penalty reduction under Louisiana’s program. The following types of violations are excluded from coverage:

  • violations that result in serious actual harm to the environment;
  • violations that may present an imminent or substantial endangerment to the environment or public health;
  • violations discovered by LDEQ or EPA prior to written disclosure of the violation to LDEQ;
  • violations detected through monitoring, sampling, or auditing procedures that are required by law, permit, or consent agreement;
  • violations that are subject to the chemical accident prevention provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 68 and LAC § 33:III.5901;
  • deliberate or intentional violations; or
  • those that are the same or closely related to prior violations at the same facility within the past three years.

LAC § 33:I.7007(A). EPA and Texas’s programs exclude similar violations. Texas’s program also excludes violations that result in a substantial economic benefit that give the violator a clear advantage over its business competitors.

Penalty Reduction Requirements. To qualify for a 100% penalty reduction under the regulations, the following nine conditions must be met:

  1. the violation was systematically discovered via an environmental audit;
  2. the violation was voluntarily disclosed to LDEQ;
  3. the violation was disclosed in writing within 45 days of discovery;
  4. the violation was independently discovered by the owner or operator before LDEQ would have identified the problem through investigation;
  5. the violation was corrected as expeditiously as possible and no later than 90 days from the date of discovery;
  6. measures were implemented to prevent recurrence of the violation;
  7. the same or closely related violations have not occurred at the same facility within the past three years;
  8. the violation is not excluded (as described above); and
  9. the owner or operator cooperates with LDEQ as needed.

Where the violation was not systematically discovered via an environmental audit, only a 75% reduction is available. LAC § 33:I.7009(E).

EPA’s Audit Policy mentions similar conditions and incentives, but it requires disclosure of the violation within 21 days of discovery (rather than 45 days) and requires corrective actions to be taken within 60 days from the date of discovery (rather than 90 days). Further, EPA’s Audit Policy merely allows for elimination of the gravity component of the penalty rather than the entire penalty, but it also allows for a determination not to recommend criminal prosecution of disclosing entities. Texas’s program requires disclosure of the violation “promptly after knowledge” and requires corrective actions to be taken “within a reasonable time,” with no specific timeline mentioned for either. Texas’s program also differs because it allows for immunity from administrative or civil penalties.

Notice Requirements. To participate in the program, the owner or operator must, prior to initiating a voluntary environmental audit, notify the LDEQ of its intent to perform the audit via submission of LDEQ’s approved notice of audit form located on LDEQ’s website. LAC § 33:I.7009(A)(1). Thereafter, LDEQ must acknowledge receipt of the notice of audit in writing. Id. If the owner or operator cannot complete the audit within six months after the date of initiation, it must submit in a written request for extension “at least 30 calendar days prior to the expiration of the audit period with sufficient information to justify an extension.” LAC § 33:I.7009(B)(1). The justification for an extension of time is “limited to factors beyond the control of the owner of operator.” Id. Texas’s program also requires prior notice describing when the audit will begin and the audit’s general scope, and Texas requires completion of the audit within six months after the date of initiation. EPA’s Audit Policy, however, does not specifically mention prior notice as a prerequisite for participation in its program, nor does it provide a timeline for completion of the audit.

Disclosure Requirements. Owners or operators must disclose any violations, and corrective actions, if applicable, to LDEQ upon discovery of such violations by submitting to the LDEQ an approved disclosure of violation(s) form located on its website. LAC § 33:I.7009(A)(2). LDEQ must then acknowledge receipt of the disclosure of violation(s) in writing, which will “include a concurrence or rejection of the proposed corrective actions.” Id.

Confidentiality Provision. Louisiana’s program also includes several miscellaneous provisions. Under the program’s confidentiality provision, LDEQ must hold the disclosure of violation(s) and other documentation containing the results of the voluntary self-audit confidential “until a final decision is made, or a period not to exceed two years from the receipt of the initial disclosure of violation, whichever occurs first.” LAC § 33:I.7009(F)(1). Texas’s program provides for a more robust privilege that generally makes any part of an audit report privileged, and not admissible as evidence or subject to discovery in a civil action or an administrative proceeding. EPA’s Audit Policy, however, does not contain a confidentiality or privilege section.

Prescription. Upon LDEQ’s receipt of the disclosure of the violation(s) in accordance with the voluntary self-audit regulations, Louisiana’s program suspends the prescriptive period (which is typically five years) for all audit claims related to violations under the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act. Suspension terminates “upon a final decision … or after a period of two years, whichever occurs first.” LAC § 33:I.7015(A). EPA and Texas’s programs do not provide for such a provision.

For states that have adopted their own audit policies in federally authorized, approved, or delegated programs, EPA will generally defer to the state’s penalty mitigation for self-disclosures as long as the state policy meets minimum requirements for federal delegation. Because Louisiana’s audit program has not been officially recognized by EPA, it would be prudent for operators to consult EPA’s Audit Policy in conjunction with Louisiana’s self-audit regulations.

For further information regarding this blog, contact Liskow attorneys Colin North, Emily von Qualen, Clare Bienvenu, and Greg Johnson.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Practices

  • Industrial Project Development

Related Team

  • Colin North
  • Emily von Qualen
  • Greg L. Johnson
  • Clare M. Bienvenu
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Blogs
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog