• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

FTC and DOJ Propose Burdensome Overhaul to HSR Premerger Reporting Requirements

07.03.23 | 4 minute read

On June 27, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission, with the concurrence of the Department of Justice (the “Agencies”), announced a proposal to effect major revisions to the current premerger notification requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (the “HSR”). HSR filings are generally required for larger mergers and acquisitions.

Under the HSR, the filings allow the Agencies to evaluate whether a certain transaction is violative of anti-trust laws. Major changes include:

  • The HSR approval process cannot be undertaken based upon a letter of intent; rather, HSR filers must submit a detailed draft agreement or term sheet that sufficiently describes the transaction’s scope;
  • Imposition of document-retention obligations upon filing parties, such that all communications systems or messaging applications on any device used by the acquiring or acquired person must be identified if said mediums could be used to store or transmit information regarding its business operations. A filing person would be required to certify that they took steps to prevent destruction of relevant information. The proposed requirement would encompass “internal chat technologies,” including those which automatically delete content, necessitating the disabling of any auto-delete settings;
  • The establishment of an electronic filing system;
  • Reporting of all entities or individuals, even limited partners (who are currently not required to be identified), holding 5% or more of (1) the acquiring entity; (2) any entity directly or indirectly controlled by the acquiring entity; (3) any entity directly or indirectly controlling same; and (4) any entity within the acquiring person that has been or will be created by the transaction’s effectuation;
  • In order to “reduce the additional burden” imposed by the changes, the Agencies proposed that the acquired person need only identify minority holders of the acquired entity(ies) that will retain an interest in said entity(ies) or will receive interests in any entity within the acquiring person;
  • The requirement of separate filings for HSR filers that are both an acquiring and acquired person;
  • English translations of all foreign-language documents;
  • Additional disclosures as to organization structure of the Ultimate Parent Entity and identity of individuals and other entities that may hold influence over access to confidential business information or business decisions;
  • Identification of officers, directors, or board observers of all entities within the acquiring person and acquired entity. Further, filers would have to identify all other entities for which these individuals currently serve, or have within two years prior served, as an officer, director, or board observer;
  • Submission of a narrative providing all strategic rationales for a transaction, a diagram of the deal structure with a corresponding chart explaining relevant entities and individuals involved in the transaction, all transaction-specific agreements inclusive of schedules and exhibits, all agreements between any entity within the acquiring person and any entity within the acquired person that are effective at the time of the HSR filing or have been effective within the year prior to filing, and a narrative timeline setting forth key dates and closing conditions;
  • Currently, HSR disclosures require filing persons to provide all studies, surveys, reports, plans, and analyses that were provided by or for officers or directors to evaluate the acquisition regarding market shares, competition, potential for sales growth, or expansion into products or geographic markets (“transaction-related documents”). The proposals would add the supervisory deal team lead(s) to the list, thereby requiring the submission of transaction-related documents provided by or for the supervisory deal team lead(s). The revisions further require filers to submit drafts of transaction-related documents if such drafts were provided to officers, directors, or supervisory deal team lead(s);
  • The filing person’s provision of narratives that (i) describe basic business lines; (ii) provide product or service information for all related entities; (iii) disclose potential horizontal overlap between filing persons; and (iv) provide information about employees and the services employees provide; and
  • The narrative responses would have to provide an overview of the filing person’s principal categories and services, both current and planned, and identify current or potential horizontal and/or vertical overlaps between filing persons.

The revisions stand to impose a much higher burden upon HSR filers and will undoubtedly increase the volume of documents agencies receive, and in turn review, for transactions exceeding the minimum HSR threshold resulting in unprecedented, material delays in the merger process—even for transactions not raising any possible antitrust concerns. Public comments can be made until August 8, 2023.     

Please contact Leon Rittenberg III, Leon J. “Trey” Reymond III, or Ben Parks should you have any questions regarding the Agencies’ proposed changes. 

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (“Liskow & Lewis”) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

Primary Sidebar

Related Team

  • Media item displaying: Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Leon H. Rittenberg III

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.299.6135504.299.6135
    995
  • Media item displaying: Leon J. “Trey” Reymond III

    Leon J. “Trey” Reymond III

    Shareholder

    New Orleans
    504.556.4028504.556.4028
    995
Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog