• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

liskow_lewis_white_new

future-focused

  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
Blogs

Fifth Circuit Affirms decision to hold assignor solidary liable on JOA: Chieftain Int’l (U.S.), Inc., Hunt Chieftain Dev., L.P.. Hunt Oil Co. v. Southeast Offshore, Inc.

12.22.08 | 2 minute read

by Elisabeth Lorio

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana’s decision to grant partial summary judgment in favor of the operator co-owner in a dispute over liability after a fellow co-owner’s assignment of lease interests governed by joint operating agreements (JOAs). Southeast acquired ownership of fractional working interests in two oil and gas leases in the Gulf of Mexico governed by two separate, yet nearly identical JOAs. After acquiring the interests in the leases, Southeast became a party to and assumed the rights and obligations under the JOAs. Hunt, a co-owner and operator of the leases, advanced 100% of the costs of operations and later billed the other co-owners for their virile portion. After a number of years, Southeast ceased paying Hunt for its share of the expenses. Subsequently, Southeast entered into a written assignment with South Pass Properties, South Pass assuming all of Southeast’s rights and obligations under the leases and JOAs.  South Pass, however, never paid the outstanding balance owed to Hunt.

Hunt filed suit against both Southeast and South Pass alleging that Southeast’s assignment did not release Southeast from its obligations under the JOAs. The district court agreed, finding Southeast solidary liable, as the language of the JOAs did not unambiguously effect a release of Southeast. The Fifth Circuit affirmed the decision of the district court, holding that an assignee and an assignor remain solidarily liable to the assignor’s obligations to a third party unless third party releases the assignor. The appellate court found that the record was devoid of any effective release of Southeast by Hunt. In its decision, the Court rejected Southeast’s argument that the language of the JOA served as a release of Southeast from its liability after it assigned its interests to South Pass. Since the JOAs did not contain a clear and unambiguous release of Southeast by Hunt, Southeast was found solidarily liable for the obligations under the leases and JOAs.

Primary Sidebar

Liskow & Lewis, APLC
Arrow Icon

future-focused

  • Baton Rouge
  • Houston
  • Lafayette
  • New Orleans
  • New York City
  • © 2026 Liskow & Lewis, APLC
  • Sitemap
  • Disclaimer
  • Employee Login
Site by
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
Cookie SettingsAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
  • Team
  • Practices
  • Insights
  • Perspectives
  • Offices
  • Pro Bono
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • DEI
  • The Energy Law Blog
  • Gulf Coast Business Law Blog
  • The Maritime Law Blog